Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Hindu terrorism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Saffron terror)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hindu terrorism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Auto-archiving period: 3 months
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Hindu terrorism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Hindu terrorism at the Reference desk.
[画像:Peace dove with olive branch in its beak] Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is written in Indian English , which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject icon Hinduism High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Religion Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion , a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion -related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Crime and Criminal Biography : Terrorism High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject icon Politics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon India Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India , which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page .IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Saffron terror was copied or moved into Mecca Masjid blast with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

On 30 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 July 2024

[edit ]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "Other incidents" section, please change, "The Indian Home Secretary R. K. Singh said that at least 10 people having close links with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its affiliated organisations were named accused in various acts of terror across India.[72] According to released documents by WikiLeaks, Congress(I) party's general secretary Rahul Gandhi remarked to US Ambassador Tim Roemer, at a luncheon hosted by Prime Minister of India at his residence in July 2009, that the RSS was a "bigger threat" to India than the Lashkar-e-Taiba.[73] At The Annual Conference of Director Generals of Police held in New Delhi on 16 September 2011, a special director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) reportedly informed the state police chiefs that Hindutva activists have either been suspected or are under investigation in 16 incidents of bomb blasts in the country." to, "The Indian Home Secretary R. K. Singh said that at least 10 people having close links with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its affiliated organisations were falsely named accused in various acts of terror across India.[72] According to released documents by WikiLeaks, Congress(I) party's general secretary Rahul Gandhi alleged at a luncheon hosted by the Prime Minister of India at his residence in July 2009 for the US Ambassador Tim Roemer, that the RSS was a "bigger threat" to India than the Lashkar-e-Taiba.[73] At The Annual Conference of Director Generals of Police held in New Delhi on 16 September 2011, a special director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) reportedly informed the state police chiefs that Hindutva activists have either been suspected or are under false investigations, in 16 incidents of bomb blasts in the country." 103.216.233.47 (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Arjayay, Xoocit, Magentic Manifestations, Soni, Rohitsetthachok, Toadboy123, RogerYg, please carry out the above request.-103.216.233.47 (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
@Soni: None of those allegations have been proved, so please just add the term, "allegations" as I have requested above (I have edited each sentence).-103.216.233.47 (talk) 16:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
You may add, "Trying to control the damage, the Congress acknowledged that Gandhi had indeed spoken to Roemer on the issue.[1] [2] " 103.216.233.47 (talk) 16:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
You can add, "Rahul's assumptions are preposterous. The Congress party is promoting Hindu-Muslim divide," as per BJP spokesperson Tarun Vijay.[3] -103.216.233.47 (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 103.216.233.47 (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Please also add, "It is shocking that there is a race in the seniorCongress leadership to indirectly or directly support jehadi terror and to project Hindus as terrorists in this country, that too in gross violation of established diplomatic norms and procedures," senior RSS leader Ram Madhav responded. [4] 103.216.233.47 (talk) 17:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
UnpetitproleX, CapnJackSp, please respond.-103.216.233.47 (talk) 06:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Just to make it easier for others to understand, that IP is asking to change what there is in the "Other incidents" section, to, "The Indian Home Secretary R. K. Singh said that at least 10 people having close links with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its affiliated organisations were falsely named accused in various acts of terror across India.[72] According to released documents by WikiLeaks, Congress(I) party's general secretary Rahul Gandhi alleged at a luncheon hosted by the Prime Minister of India at his residence in July 2009 for the US Ambassador Tim Roemer, that the RSS was a "bigger threat" to India than the Lashkar-e-Taiba.[73] At The Annual Conference of Director Generals of Police held in New Delhi on 16 September 2011, a special director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) reportedly informed the state police chiefs that Hindutva activists have either been suspected or are under false investigations, in 16 incidents of bomb blasts in the country. Trying to control the damage, the Congress acknowledged that Gandhi had indeed spoken to Roemer on the issue.[1] [2] "Rahul's assumptions are preposterous. The Congress party is promoting Hindu-Muslim divide," as per BJP spokesperson Tarun Vijay.[3] "It is shocking that there is a race in the senior Congress leadership to indirectly or directly support jehadi terror and to project Hindus as terrorists in this country, that too in gross violation of established diplomatic norms and procedures," senior RSS leader Ram Madhav responded.[4] "
Arjayay, Xoocit, Magentic Manifestations, UnpetitproleX, CapnJackSp, Rohitsetthachok, Toadboy123, RogerYg, Apart from the request above, in the Terminology section, under the, "Hindu terrorism" and "Hindutva terrorism" sub-section, please change the last sentence from, .....such as Pragya Thakur and Aseemanand, have been arrested and tried to, .... such as Pragya Thakur and Aseemanand, have been arrested and tried.[7] Aseemananand has being acquitted of all charges.[5] and according to Amit Shah, Pragya Thakur has also been cleared of all charges; Amit Shah also condemned the Congress party for coining the imaginary term, "Hindu terror".[6] ". Please also read through the entire article, it is completely anti-Hindu and is against the WP:NPOV rule! Please change it to become more neutral.-2406:.&checktime(7400,90,92,':')A7:98E9:41A1:8E37:C924 (talk) 12:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
I'm skeptical how much of this is based on RS, but Ill go through these sources in a few days and have a look. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
@CapnJackSp: Please also read through the entire article, it is completely anti-Hindu and is against the WP:NPOV rule! Please change it to become more neutral.-2406:.&checktime(7400,90,92,':')A7:884A:1F5:AE5C:C0E7 (talk) 12:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 15:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

References

  1. ^ a b Bureau, ITGD (2010年12月17日). "BJP, RSS target Rahul over Hindu terror remarks". India Today. Retrieved 2024年07月07日. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  2. ^ a b Bureau, Mail Today (2010年12月18日). "Radical Hindu groups bigger threat than LeT, says Rahul". India Today. Retrieved 2024年07月07日. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  3. ^ a b "WikiLeaks: Controversy over Rahul's Hindu extremism remarks". NDTV.com. 2019年02月22日. Retrieved 2024年07月07日.
  4. ^ a b "Radical Hindu Groups Major Threat To India, Rahul Told Roemer". India TV News. 2010年12月17日. Retrieved 2024年07月07日.
  5. ^ "Swami Aseemanand, 3 others acquitted in 2007 Samjhauta Express bombing case". Hindustan Times. 2019年03月20日. Retrieved 2019年12月31日.
  6. ^ "Amit Shah 'Defends' Sadhvi Pragya's Candidature, Says She's Answer to Congress's 'Hindu Terror' Coinage". News18. 17 April 2019. Retrieved 12 July 2024.

References in the Lead

[edit ]

Since this is a contentious topic, we need strong WP:RS references in the lead too, and any accusations should have credible sources. Also, any claims, opinions, and content without WP: RS references should be avoided. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Added missing references for the 2007-2008 attacks in the lead. Also for clarity of the chronology and context, the attacks need to be mentioned before the alleged accused, as the primary attacks in the sources are 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings and 2008 Malegaon blasts. RogerYg (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 October 2024

[edit ]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the, "2008 western India bombings" sub-section of the, "2007-2008" section, please change, "NIA, National Investigation Agency, has found no evidence against Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and it has recommended the court to drop all charges against her.[59][60] following which Bombay High Court granted bail to Pragya Thakur on 22 April 2017." to, "NIA, National Investigation Agency, has found no evidence against Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and it has recommended the court to drop all charges against her,[59][60] following which the Bombay High Court granted bail to Pragya Thakur on 22 April 2017." Please also remove the </ref> tag in the sub-section just above that. In the first sub-section of the, "2007-2008" section, the last sentence has two full stops, please correct that also. 2406:.&checktime(7400,90,5,':')E60:2FAD:64ED:1D27:CE84 (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Inclusion of Samjhauta Express incident with the topic

[edit ]

There are no clear link of saffron terror with Samjhauta Express incident Even NIA has linked Islamic terrorist groups LeT, HM etc if claims of several political leaders, authors or media house are considered as reliable source wikipedia then it's really concerning WikiEdits2003 (talk) 03:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I'm not sure what your mean. The link is quite plain. That there has no successful prosecution is simply a reflection of the deeply incompetent local justice system, but it doesn't negate the link. Iskandar323 (talk) 04:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Personal opinions don't matter here on Wikipedia
provide some reliable source so we can add here on the page
@Iskandar323 WikiEdits2003 (talk) 09:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Also the incident was linked with Islamic terrorist organisation LeT
it seems like the information is bias too and those organisations which were linked to terrorism haven't been designated terrorist organisations just like LeT, Al Qaeda etc like Islamic terrorist organisations WikiEdits2003 (talk) 09:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Terrorism in India: Method in Madness? Pp.57–58. NB: the Samjuhata Express tragedy not only dispelled the alleged involvement of Pakistan's agencies or groups but emphasized the lethality of the threat emanating from inside elements belonging to Hindu terrorist network. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Merge proposal

[edit ]

There's a relatively new article entitled Hindutva iconoclasm, but given that icons aren't a prominent feature of Islam, this seems a topic of uncertain coherence. The contents seem more to cover Hindu terrorism, and doesn't discuss Iconoclasm, so I suggest merging the content to here without including the concept of iconoclasm. Klbrain (talk) 10:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

In the Indian context the above seems untrue, so I would be inclined to oppose. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /