Talk:Rotzo Formation
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[画像:Good articles] Rotzo Formation was nominated as a Natural sciences good article , but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 29, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology , an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Should be nominated for Featured List, not GA
[edit ]Hi Yewtharaptor, I noticed that you nominated this list article for GA. However, as a list, it should instead be nominated as a Featured List. See the criteria here. Thanks, Enwebb (talk) 15:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Is this some kind of joke? This article is far from anywhere near a GA. See for better examples Tremp Formation. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
- And of course this is not a list, but a formation. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
GA Review
[edit ]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rotzo Formation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 04:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
Procedural fail: This article is organized as a list, not a prose article. Therefore, it should be nominated for recognition at WP:FLC, not here. b uidh e 04:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance C-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles