Talk:Reno 911!: Miami
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Untitled
[edit ]http://www.tvguide.com/News/Insider/?cmsGuid=%7BD2A1A689-CE39-455E-B685-8A5F3EA63494%7D deputy garcia said the movie was finished february 2006. also the same article said this "TVGuide.com: What can we expect from Reno 911! Miami? Alazraqui: The movie will be a classic fish-out-of-water story. It involves a big police-safety convention in Miami to which we've been invited, but we can't get in because we don't have our passes. Then there's a biological scare inside the convention center and the officers of Reno have to protect Miami and save the day. The film has some fun guest stars like Paul Rudd and Patton Oswalt, and a few big surprises."138.40.163.141 11:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
Page needs major editing for clarity, grammar, and spelling, as well as to better summarize the plot. Perhaps someone with the time may do so, or I will attempt to when possible. Jimzim66 05:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
Fair use rationale for Image:51SbN2wNzpL. AA240 .jpg
[edit ]
Image:51SbN2wNzpL. AA240 .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
