Talk:Religion and agriculture
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Religion and agriculture article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion , a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion -related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Neutrality
[edit ]The use of words like "neglected until recent times," "realized", and so on seriously calls into question the neutrality of this article. Badbilltucker 17:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
checkY The article has been rewritten. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
WikiProject class rating
[edit ]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]