Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Relational database

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Relational database article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives : 1, 2, 3 Auto-archiving period: 10 months
The content of Relational database management system was merged into Relational database on 28 April 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Relational database received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived . It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Computing Top‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases
WikiProject icon Computer science Top‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:
WikiProject icon Software : Computing High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as High-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit ]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LBJJames.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Databases Template

[edit ]

Added the Databases Template {{Databases}} to the page because this page is referenced by the template and it provides useful context to the subject.

References

[edit ]

Please clarify first commercial database for visitors

[edit ]

The article states that Relational Software released the first commercial relational database in 1979. It also states that the first RDBMS sold was Multics Relational Store in 1978. If it was sold, wasn't it commercial? But, IBM sold System R to customers (Pratt & Whitney) I believe as early as 1977 and that is not even mentioned here. If they sold it, it was a supported product, therefore commercial. I'm old enough to remember that; maybe that is unfortunate :)

To be clear, I am not trying to argue here the point of who is first, you may have your own conditions for that definition. I was pointing a student at this article and then I realized that this information needs to be clarified. Maybe Relational Software/Oracle was the first to sell a significant number of copies? Maybe the definition of commercial used here needs to be stated?

Jmussman (talk) 17:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

This article lacks a Criticisms/disadvantages section

[edit ]

NoSQL databases were invented for a reason, but judging from this article, no such reason exists, and neither do alternative database types eg noSQL. An opportunity exists for making this article more comprehensive. FreeFlow99 (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /