Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:RTI-55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mentropane in topic Definition of terms used
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RTI-55 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources:Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WPrefs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Pharmacology Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about RTI-55.

Definition of terms used

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 3 comments3 people in discussion

This article uses words such as "juicy", "clean", and "dirty" in a manner that is purportedly to aid laymen in understanding the information. These words do not actually accomplish their goal, in addition to implying facts which can be shown to be false.

With regards to "clean" & "dirty": a compound which is contaminated /could/ be called "dirty", with a purified form being called "clean"; however, this summary is referring to one chemical as clean and another as dirty, with the meaning being that the "dirty" precursor is dangerous and the "clean" product is not. This is both factually incorrect and dangerous, as it presents medical information in a manner that, through warped meaning, will lead to injury if used.

Regarding "juicy", I am a Chemical Engineer and have /NEVER/ heard of a "juicy" electron or Iodine atom. Such a term does not have any scientific merit and belies a lack of anytechnical knowledge by the author.

Matthias Alexander Jude Shapiro (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Reply

I agree with you, so I've done a bit of copyediting including removing those terms. Feel free to edit the article yourself if you feel other changes are still needed. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Reply
Dirty, in reference to a drug, can also (even typically) mean that the drug is not "selective", ie. it affects many receptors typically in a way that produces side effects. -- Mentropane (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2019 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /