Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:RAF Woodbridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Military history : Aviation / British / European / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War C‐class
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject icon Aviation : Airports
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airport project .
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MoD Woodbridge

[edit ]

Should this article provide clearer information on its current use as a barracks?[1], [2].unsigned PeterEastern 18 Feb 2012

move to 'MoD Woodbridge'

[edit ]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was: Withdrawn by proposer. Station1 (talk) 06:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC) [reply ]


RAF WoodbridgeMoD WoodbridgeRelisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

  • I have clarified the history of the site more clearly now in the lead emphasising the heritage of the base whilest not ignoring its current usage. I would suggest that the article could accommodate more information about current usage if someone wanted to add it in due course. As time goes by a move/split may wish to be reconsidered, however I am content to leave it for now with the current title and as a single article. PeterEastern (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
  • I passed the base last weekend and noted that there seems to be considerable confusion about what it is called, with three different road signs on the approach to the base calling it by different names. The first sign was for 'Woodbridge Airfield', the next for 'MoD Woodbridge' and at the entrance for 'Sutton Heath - Rock Barracks'. This seems to be another reason to leave the name of the article unchanged at the present time. As proposer of the move, I am not sure how I should close the move request as 'rejected', possibly someone else could do that in due course. PeterEastern (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on RAF Woodbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Timeline not clear

[edit ]

The layout seems disjointed, and the article is currently more focussed on units (squadrons), including one (79th FS/TFS) that was a bit of a cuckoo. Consequently the timeline is fragmented as follows

  • WWII (1943-45)
  • 79th FS (1952 - 1970)
  • Twin-bases (1958 - 1993)
  • 67 ARRS (1970 - 1992)
  • 1990's (closure 1992/93)

Somehow, the most significant period (1958-93), the most significant units (81st TFW), and the most significant aircraft (F-4D Phantom) are all relegated to 'barely mentioned'. Indeed, the F-4 Phantom doesn't even get a photo!

This needs to be put right. First on my list will be a photo of an 81st TFW F-4D with base code 'WR' writ large all over the tail, not the scrawny version barely visible on the later A-10s. Lol.

WendlingCrusader (talk) 10:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /