Talk:PsiQuantum
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on July 23, 2022. The result of the discussion was delete.
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | |||||||||||||||
Secondary sources
[edit ]Hi all,
I am the creator of this article in its second incarnation. I have tried to address the comments about the previous lack of secondary sources and have added quite a few. I am not sure what more is required and why what is already there is not sufficient. Happy to discuss. Ctjk (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- To clarify, I am not connected to the first version which was ultimately deleted. I can see that the earlier version did not cite as many secondary sources and have tried to address that point in my version. Ctjk (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hi @Ctjk. Could you please confirm if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, because if so you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- No, I don't have any connection with the company. I am a legal official at a major government antitrust agency. The only plausible connection is we regulate tech firms Ctjk (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Ctjk: I have reviewed the article and it seems to me that the company has, as of now, received sufficient coverage (WP:CORPDEPTH) to merit inclusion within en-wiki, especially in light of the new funding it received from governments in 2024 (I have slightly expanded the Australian funding section based on the sources and analysis I found, some of which are critical of some of the company's statements - which is a good indicator of independence). It seems to me that this article would likely survive at AfD now given the continued in-depth coverage in independent sources. Pilaz (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- No, I don't have any connection with the company. I am a legal official at a major government antitrust agency. The only plausible connection is we regulate tech firms Ctjk (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hi @Ctjk. Could you please confirm if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, because if so you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Let's see if it sticks for now, thanks for trying User:Ctjk. Deletionism in Wikipedia is excessive these days, and could open space for other projects to come along. For the benefit of others, I was the previous creator, and this is the discussion page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PsiQuantum Cirosantilli2 (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]