Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Pokémon Scarlet and Violet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articles Pokémon Scarlet and Violet has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review : December 7, 2024. (Reviewed version ).
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pokémon Scarlet and Violet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find video game sources: "Pokémon Scarlet and Violet" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk
Archives: 1 Auto-archiving period: 28 days 
This article is written in American English , which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Pokémon Top‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject icon Video games : Nintendo Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force .
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
AfDs
Merge discussions
Other discussions
No major discussions
Featured content candidates
Good article nominations
DYK nominations
Reviews and reassessments
WikiProject icon Japan Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:12, March 30, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh )JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles : None
Pictures : None
Lists : None

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
A fact from Pokémon Scarlet and Violet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
  • Did you know... that Pokémon Scarlet and Violet became the lowest-rated mainline entries in the franchise's history due to performance issues at launch?
A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet.
Wikipedia

Nemona in Wikipedia

[edit ]

Hey, guys, I made an article on Wikipedia for Nemona.

Here's the link Draft:Nemona. Starkiryu64 (talk) 07:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello Starkiryu64. Firstly: the draft is only one sentence long. Secondly: if you would expand it and move it to the main space, it would be deleted, because it lacks sufficient notability. At Bulbapedia, such content is welcome though. 😉 Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Seeking consensus on English across all Pokemon game articles.

[edit ]

I propose that we standardize the existing nine generations to American English. It is a bit jarring to see that Generation 1-7 articles are written in American English, while Generation 8 is a mix of British and American, and Gen 9 is British.

Separate from the Manual of Style, I believe consistency is a valid reason to align these articles. Tom.berryx (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Given the majority of the articles are in American English, it should probably be standardized to American for simplicity's sake, but I admittedly don't mind either way what the outcome of this discussion is. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
I think the idea behind Sword/Shield being British English was probably because the game's setting was based on the U.K., but I agree that Scarlet/Violet especially should probably be in American English if we're striving for cross-series standardization. DecafPotato (talk) 03:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
I thought Pokémon Violet was released in 2023, not 2022. I play it sometimes and I believe it was released in 2023. Am I wrong? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 12:48, 5 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
@Yuanmongolempiredynasty it released in 2022. Late 2022 (November), granted, but still in 2022. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
as is, the games generally use unitedstatesian english, but gen 8 uses englandian english. using yeehaw english for most articles and crumpet english for swsh seems like the way to go cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
+1. I'd say we use British English for Gen 8, and American English for the rest. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
I'd assume we're at a consensus for American English? I ask primarily because the article's GA review is currently active, and it's best to resolve anything that would cause a sweeping change as soon as possible. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
yeah, (削除) american (削除ここまで) unovan english for most articles, (削除) british (削除ここまで) galarian english for swsh specifically (and i guess its pokémon) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

GA Review

[edit ]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 02:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]


Been wanting to pick this up for a while but didnt because I haddent finished the game yet. So glad the GA backlog is more powerful then my lack of skill. At a first glance it looks not just good but good enough. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
(削除) In the side table for the games scores anything that rates the game out of ten uses numbers instead of stars with the exception of Nintendo Life. Any reason? (削除ここまで)
(削除) The line "Parent company Nintendo attempted to takedown many of these leaks, but other accounts reposted the information taken down" reads a little oddly. (削除ここまで)
(削除) Is it worth linking both DLC given that the redirect to The Hidden Treasure of Area Zero which is linked immediately before (削除ここまで)
(削除) (削除ここまで)
(削除) "though is forced by its programming" -> "though its programming forces it" MOS:TENSE (削除ここまで)
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable , as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
(削除) Ref 41 change source to The Pokemon Company and also link for consistency (削除ここまで)
(削除)
Ref 42 link CNET for consistency
Ref 25 link 4Gamer.net for consistency
Ref 79 link Men's Journal for consistency
Ref 97 link The Daily Telegraph for consistency
(削除ここまで)
(削除) Ref 125 link Oricon News for consistency (削除ここまで)
Reliability of a few sources
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
only one minor issue about a different page which.
  1. It is illustrated by images , where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Everything is tagged appropriately
(削除) With the only avalible image of Toby Fox being the one in the article. I question if its worth including an image of Fox (削除ここまで)

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Answers

[edit ]

On a few of your points:

-Nintendo Life uses the stars I believe because it's the only out of ten scale explicitly using stars. Admittedly unsure if there's a policy regarding the usage of stars over numbers or not depending on the outlet.
-Does "Parent company Nintendo attempted to takedown many of these leaks, but other accounts reposted the information after it was taken down." read better?
-Linked the specific expansions just in case readers were unfamiliar with the two DLCs, as it would allow them an easy link to either one in case they confused names or something similar. Can remove this if you feel it necessary.
-I included the image of Fox since I figured any form of identification was better than none. It seemed odd to me not to use it given it's the only one we have and we don't need to be too concerned with a "primary" identifier here, unlike at Fox's main article. There have been BLPs using lower quality images than that one.
-Addressing your concern on stability that you mentioned in the edit history: the stability criteria states that " it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute." The actual page content has not been changing day to day, and no edit warring has occurred, as a result of the discussion on the talk page. The changes it asks aren't too egregious, and support for American English seems unanimous as of now. I've left a message to double check the status of it so I can resolve it sooner, but I do believe this discussion is irrelevant to the stability criteria and would not result in a significant quality decrease if it did go through. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Great! Also the last bit was a joke Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Could you explain the reliability of the following sources?

  • Nintendo World Report
  • 4p.de
  • Gaming Intel
  • RPGFan

@Pokelego999: a few more notes should be done with the page by tomorrow Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@OlifanofmrTennant Nintendo World Report, 4players, and RPGFan are considered reliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. I missed Gaming Intel during editing but at a glance seems reliable-ish, but it being outside the coverage area for this article makes me hesitant. I've replaced it with a Nintendo Life source reiterating the exact same info. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
@OlifanofmrTennant fixed the linking issues in the requested areas Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Checked 15 sources at random. Found nothing else. Good job Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Did you know nomination

[edit ]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Ed Sheeran as seen in 2018
Ed Sheeran as seen in 2018
"Ed Sheeran's new song Celestial will apparently feature somewhere in the game... Celestial will be the first song included in a Pokemon game that actually has lyrics."
https://www.rpgfan.com/music-review/nintendo-switch-pokemon-scarlet%E3%83%BBviolet-the-hidden-treasure-of-area-zero-super-music-collection/
"I wasn’t expecting the Ed Sheeran single that plays during the end credits to be on this OST."
  • ALT1: ... that due to performance issues at launch in the 2022 video games Pokémon Scarlet and Violet , the games became the lowest rated mainline entries in the franchise's history?
"The flaws are seemingly endless, impacting gameplay so much that Scarlet and Violet have become the worst-reviewed games in the series."
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Ed Sheeran image is only for if the first hook is used.
Improved to Good Article status by Pokelego999 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC).[reply ]

  • Everything seems to be in order. GA was on the 7th, article is long enough and appropriately sourced. It looks like some of the images are yours—why aren't we using this gem?—and are good to go. Hook is fascinating enough and the picture of Mr. Sheeran, while haunting, is good at 100px. Overall, great job! ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Image depicting Toby Fox?

[edit ]

The page for developer Toby Fox uses an avatar commonly used to represent him, and not the image of him covered in foam, with points raised such as MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE, and it's probably more distracting. What's the consensus on changing the image in question? Plebiano (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Plebiano that avatar is a fair use image and also currently under an image review. The only free use representation of Fox is the foam shower one, and some form of visual identification is probably better than none. Other BLPs use less effective images than Fox's. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
I believe the current image depicted is a sufficiently informative, doesn't help users understand the subject matter, and may even distract from the information of the page. I don't think other pages should have ineffective images either, but that's neither here nor there. Plebiano (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Peer review

[edit ]


I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to Featured Article at some point in the future, and wish to get a gauge for what more I need to add or rewrite before making a nomination. I've done a few FLs before, so I have a few ideas of what I need done, but I wished to get some more input since FA is a whole new beast for me as an editor. Please feel free to tear into any and all parts of the article with this, and all advice is appreciated!

Thanks, Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /