Talk:Poales
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
‹ The template below (Merged-from ) is being considered for merging with Copied. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›
The contents of the Eriocaulales page were merged into Poales on 17 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history ; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
‹ The template below (Merged-from ) is being considered for merging with Copied. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›
The contents of the Cyperales page were merged into Poales on 17 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history ; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Flowers bracteate and usually small, arranged into inflorescences of various forms (except for genus Mayaca, which has solitary terminal flowers - this does not sound like a very easy and clear sentence. TeunSpaans 21:53, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- This means that
- All Poales have bracteate and usually small flowers
- All Poales except Mayaca have inflorescences.
- I don't know how to rephrase it better. Iorsh 12:28, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- What do you think about this change? TeunSpaans 19:37, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Iorsh 20:56, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- What do you think about this change? TeunSpaans 19:37, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Why is the English Thurniaceae entry in Esperanto? SleekWeasel 23:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Not as of 2018.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC) [reply ]
Proposed merge from Eriocaulales to Poales
[edit ]- Merge - Eriocaulales is an unreferenced stub of a minor historical taxon which is now synonymized to Poales. Poales has a section on the previous APG classifications that the Eriocaulales could easily be included. Nessie (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC) [reply ]
- Agree Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
Proposed merge from Cyperales to Poales
[edit ]- Merge - Cyperales is a poorly referenced stub of a minor historical taxon which is now synonymized to Poales. Poales has a section on the previous APG classifications that the Cyperales could easily be included. Nessie (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC) [reply ]
- Agree Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]