Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Planeat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Planeat article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS  · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Articles for creation
WikiProject icon This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation . The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Note icon
This article was accepted on 14 November 2012 by reviewer Hair (talk · contribs).
WikiProject icon Film : British / Documentary
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British cinema task force .
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Documentary films task force .
WikiProject icon United Kingdom Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Veganism and Vegetarianism Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Critical reception

[edit ]

Yes, in another article it's one paragaph. However, what is done in another article is a horrible way to write an article.

Another article might have "Awards" before "Critical reception". Does that mean that article is right? Maybe, maybe not. In this case, the one "award" this movie won was from a non-notable film festival.

In the present case, the "Critical reception" section cannot be one paragraph. Why? Yes, in another article it is. Maybe that case is correct, maybe not. It doesn't matter as this is different. In this article, we don't have an introductory sentence summarizing what critics had to say. The other article does. Why don't we add one here? Simple, we don't have anything to summarize it that isn't synthesis. In the other article, we have Rotten Tomatoes' summary. In this case, the movie has gotten too little attention to have been reviewed by enough critics for Rotten Tomatoes to have a summary. As a result, lumping them together produces a pseudo-paragraph with no main idea. Rather, each review is its own little stubby paragraph. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /