Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Physiology of decompression

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Underwater diving High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving , an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject icon Physiology Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.
‹ The template below (Copied ) is being considered for merging with merged-from. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Decompression theory was copied or moved into Physiology of decompression with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Section sizes
Section size for Physiology of decompression (44 sections)
Section name Byte
count		 Section
total
(Top) 4,531 4,531
Solubility 1,630 1,630
Diffusion 1,612 1,612
Inert gas uptake (Ingassing) 1,975 5,074
Perfusion 639 639
Saturation and supersaturation 1,152 1,152
Tissue half times 1,308 1,308
Outgassing of tissues 1,460 5,109
Inherent unsaturation 2,382 2,382
Residual inert gas tissue loading 1,267 1,267
Factors influencing uptake and elimination of dissolved gases 1,101 13,091
Tissue gas loading 1,331 1,331
Breathing gas composition 2,230 2,230
Body temperature and exercise 2,037 2,037
Isobaric counterdiffusion 6,392 6,392
Bubble formation, growth and elimination 1,119 9,396
Bubble mechanics 2,439 2,439
Bubble nucleation 1,436 1,436
Bubble growth 2,036 2,036
Bubble distribution 1,037 1,037
Bubble elimination 1,329 1,329
Modes of decompression 434 434
Decompression stress 2,200 17,105
Factors influencing decompression stress and risk 2,137 14,905
Dive profile 1,827 1,827
Exercise 2,284 2,284
Thermal status 2,048 2,048
Predisposition 5,409 5,409
Behavioural or procedural factors 1,200 1,200
Decompression disorders and injuries 659 6,002
Decompression sickness 570 2,327
Problems due to vascular decompression bubbles 992 992
Extravascular bubbles 765 765
Barotraumas of decompression 1,892 1,892
Ebullism 1,124 1,124
Saturation decompression 900 7,221
Saturation decompression in diving 4,106 4,106
Altitude and hypobaric decompression 2,215 2,215
Ultrasonic bubble detection in decompression research 5,490 5,490
See also 779 779
Notes 35 35
References 34,826 37,075
Sources 2,249 2,249
Further reading 1,916 1,916
Total 116,500 116,500

B-Class review

[edit ]
B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.

    2. Comprehensively cited. checkY
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.

    3. Not fully comprehensive, but fairly extensive. checkY
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.

    4. Complies. checkY
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.

    5. Complies. checkY
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.

    6. Not an easy subject to illustrate, but there are some images.checkY
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

    7. Looks OK. checkY

Good for me. Promoted to B class. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Orphaned references in Physiology of decompression

[edit ]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Physiology of decompression's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Perdix":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Split out Decompression stress and risk factors

[edit ]

I am thinking of splitting out the material on Decompression stress and risk factors, mainly for size reasons, as that seems the component most suitable for separate discussion. Opinions are welcome, particularly if supported by logical reasons. At this stage there is no urgency. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 10:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /