Talk:Oseberg ship

Hi,

is it possible to make a clearer distinction in the text between the two? Like, which one of them wore which clothes?

Aside: Statements like " ... a diet composed mainly of meat, another luxury when most Vikings ate fish" are misleading inasmuch as they make it seem that there is knowledge where we have none. Is there a source saying that "most vikings ate fish"? There are large non-coastal areas in both Sweden and Norway (of which, btw, more than half is above 600 m, so it'd have to be flying fish), areas that instead are rich in game, and have excellent grazing for domestic animals.

T 88.89.219.147 (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hi,
according to Norwegian national broadcaster NRK, at https://tv.nrk.no/program/KOID76001515/gaaten-oseberg , aspects like the ship's 13 year life before burial as well as the hull being waterproofed (caulked?) by material between the planks led to a reexamination of the reconstruction, which was found to be faulty - no one had factored in that the traverse timbers that held the planking had been staved in as the ship lay buried under tons of soil. Correcting this led to an entirely new hull profile, and a reconstruction using the new configuration sailed without any problems.
But I don't know if the reference is RS enough for an edit.
T 85.166.163.40 (talk) 19:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Reply

Some more links, unfortunately only blogs, but they'll serve to correct inaccurqacies in my post, at least:

http://www.osebergvikingskip.no/eng/documents/reconstruction.html
http://www.oldsaltblog.com/2013/11/sailing-the-viking-longship-saga-oseberg/
http://www.vikingeskibsmuseet.dk/en/news/archive/2015/july/article/the-viking-ship-that-couldnt-sail-is-headed-for-roskilde-1/
The last link also contains a further link to the report by the Danish Viking Ship Museum.
T85.166.163.40 (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Reply

Hi, I did a (perhaps over-bold) snip of the "and then it sank" material. Remaining text needs to be tightened, perhaps some fo the previous attempts summarized? T 85.166.163.40 (talk) 01:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Oseberg Ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826084713/http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1709020.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1709020.ece
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070211143348/http://home.online.no/~joeolavl/viking/osebergskipet.htm to http://home.online.no/~joeolavl/viking/osebergskipet.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615063416/http://www.khm.uio.no/utstillinger/oseberg/indexE.html to http://www.khm.uio.no/utstillinger/oseberg/indexE.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604182721/http://www.khm.uio.no/bevaring/konservering/slede/index_eng.html to http://www.khm.uio.no/bevaring/konservering/slede/index_eng.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041211030348/http://home.online.no/~joeolavl/viking/index.htm to http://home.online.no/~joeolavl/viking/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Reply

Hey,

I was doing some research on the animals found inside the ship and different pages seemed to have differing amounts of them. For example, some pages said there were 6 dogs, some said there were 4, and some, including Wikipedia, said 3. I was wondering which source we were using here, since it wasn't cited. PineappleWizard123 (talk) 08:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC) Reply