Talk:Operation Mand

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject icon India : Punjab / History Low‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India , which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page .IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taskforce icon This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Low-importance).

Taskforce icon This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Note icon This article was last assessed in July 2023.

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit ]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

India Today sources

[edit ]

@CanadianSingh1469 Please provide

Quote from - Link: Indian Newsmagazine. 1987. - for the content cited
Articles from - India Today. 1986. and India Today. 1986.. The India Today magazine can be found at https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/1986

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 07:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Notability

[edit ]

@CanadianSingh1469 I don't see how the article has WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT notability. If there are no other reliable sources that you can provide that can assert the notability, I'll nominate for deletion next week — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Recent disruptions to this article

[edit ]

It appears the disruptive editors appeared after a Tweet went viral: [1]

The tweet was posted at 3:05 AM on Jan 16, 2025, with the Wikipedia user Xuangzadoo making an edit to change the figures in the infobox shortly after on the same day at 17:05, 16 January 2025, claiming to be removing "unsourced misinformation": [2]

Thus, this appears to be a spillover from social-media drama over on Twitter between Hindus and Sikhs. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 21:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

This user is now once again resorting to reverting [3] to old vandalized edits and ignoring wikipedia guidelines. He's also straight up refusing the consensus agreed on the talk page. Locking the page won't work until this user is banned for constant vandalism. @MaplesyrupSushi Xuangzadoo (talk) 09:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The user @MaplesyrupSushi was referring to before was you

i was just changing the edits you made to the page after it was unlocked

stop changing the page and ignoring the sources

you have been warned again

@MaplesyrupSushi please report @Xuangzadoo Sikh historians (talk) 11:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@MaplesyrupSushi @Rsjaffe

it seems @Xuangzadoo has made a new account @Ventsscone to continue edit warring changing thr false edits they made on a new account

I suggest someone ip ban them Sikh historians (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Operation_Mand&oldid=1271503667"