Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:One-parameter group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

What about the definition: the set of algebraic group homomorphisms from $\mathbb C^*$ to $G$? 129.215.104.100 (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

Usage

[edit ]

The phrase One-parameter group is often used to mean one-dimensional Lie group. At present, this article notes that a particular group homomorphism is being designated by the phrase, so that this particular kind of group is not a group. The structure of a "one-dimensional Lie group" is no different than that of the real line as a group under addition, so its features don't inspire an article. The analysis of the concept presently presented would be confusing to a general reader and verges on meta-mathematics. Given that the topic has a significant literature, there may be sources to fill the vacuum and counter the obfuscation of the non-group group.Rgdboer (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

A link to usage by Sophus Lie in 1893 has been posted.Rgdboer (talk) 03:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

That's definitely a right step. Nice work! -- Taku (talk) 04:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
The definition (as given in the lead) agrees with all literature I have come across. It is also usually pointed out that it is, in fact, not a group. The topic of this homomorphism does motivate an article imo, while the group (R, +), of course, does not. YohanN7 (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

Not a group

[edit ]

"Discussion"

That means that it is not in fact a group,<ref "One-parameter group not a group? Why?", Stack Exchange Retrieved on 9 January 2015. /ref> strictly speaking;

That is, we start knowing only that

φ ( s + t ) = φ ( s ) φ ( t ) {\displaystyle \varphi (s+t)=\varphi (s)\varphi (t)} {\displaystyle \varphi (s+t)=\varphi (s)\varphi (t)}

where s {\displaystyle s} {\displaystyle s}, t {\displaystyle t} {\displaystyle t} are the 'parameters' of group elements in G {\displaystyle G} {\displaystyle G}. We may have

φ ( s ) = e {\displaystyle \varphi (s)=e} {\displaystyle \varphi (s)=e}, the identity element in G {\displaystyle G} {\displaystyle G},

for some s 0 {\displaystyle s\neq 0} {\displaystyle s\neq 0}. This happens for example if G {\displaystyle G} {\displaystyle G} is the unit circle and

φ ( s ) = e i s {\displaystyle \varphi (s)=e_{}^{is}} {\displaystyle \varphi (s)=e_{}^{is}}.

In that case the kernel of φ {\displaystyle \varphi } {\displaystyle \varphi } consists of the integer multiples of 2 π {\displaystyle 2\pi } {\displaystyle 2\pi }.

Therefore a one-parameter group or one-parameter subgroup has to be distinguished from a group or subgroup itself, for the three reasons

  1. it has a definite parametrization,
  2. the group homomorphism may not be injective

_______

  • Much of the "Discussion" is moved here since its only reference is to Stack Exchange, not a WP:Reliable source. Ambiguous use of e is bothersome. Two snippets have been preserved.

Rgdboer (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /