Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Noise pollution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Noise pollution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL
Archives: Index, 1 Auto-archiving period: 3 months
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Engineering Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Health and fitness
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Professional sound production Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Physics : Fluid Dynamics / Acoustics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce .
This article is supported by Acoustics Taskforce .
WikiProject icon Environment Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Occupational Safety and Health
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Medicine Start‐class Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine , which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine .MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon South Africa : PSP SA
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Wikipedia Primary School project .
WikiProject icon Technology
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

To-do list for Noise pollution: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2018年08月12日


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 11 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Paul1204 (article contribs).


Evaluation

[edit ]

Lead Section

I think that the first sentence does a nice job of summing up the topic as a whole, but not the article itself. So much of the article is dedicated to how noise pollution impacts health and specifically invertebrates/ocean life, which is not touched upon until the third paragraph. I think the lead section dedicates too much content to research on noise pollution in regards to marine life, and I think this article could flow better if that section was moved to the content area. It seems too detailed to be in the lead section and the main point could instead just be given in a sentence or two.

Content

The content appears to be relevant to the topic of noise pollution and up to date. The noise control section seems like it could be added to, as it is very short compared to the rest of the sections. There are large sections of the article dedicated to how noise pollution impacts communication, development, and ecosystems but mainly seems to focus on invertebrates/ocean life and could benefit from having how humans are impacted by these areas added to those sections as well.

Tone and Balance

The article appears to be mostly neutral, but at times feels biased against the topic of noise pollution overall. The article seems to be focused on the negative impacts of noise pollution, and not the neutral impacts or the some of the other reasons behind noise pollution. The viewpoint of it having a negative impact on marine life I think is overrepresented and could be cut down to be more concise to make room for how it impacts human society and culture.

Sources and References

The sources all appear to be credible, the links work, and are current. However there are a lot more sources on the "concrete" information on noise pollution (data, scientific research, health guidelines, etc.) than there are on more "abstract" information and theory. For instance there are only 2 sources in this category and both are dedicated to Schafer out of almost 100 sources total. This section needs improvement on reflecting the available literature on the topic of noise pollution.

Organization and Writing Quality

The writing quality of this article is good. There were no noticeable grammar mistakes and the writing had an academic tone while still being easy to understand. The organization however could use some improvement. Once again I feel there was too much dedicated to the impacts of noise pollution on marine life and not enough on humans/society and these topics need to be balanced. There was also too much detail on the impacts on marine life in the introductory paragraphs that could be saved for the content area.

Images and Media

The images and media used in this article did a good job of demonstrating what was being explained in the article and appear to be cited correctly. They were also well-captioned to the point that they could stand alone even without the context of the article and were laid out in a visually appealing manner.

Talk Page Discussion

The talk page seemed to suggest a lot of the edits that I suggested in my review. There is a section dedicated to clarity edits and multiple sections dedicated to deleting information that strays too far from the main topic of the article. There was also a push for less emphasis on the impact noise pollution had on marine life and more on humans, which I still feel is lacking. There are also a number of edits that work to make the article more neutral and makes sure it backs up any blanket statements made in the text. The article has been rated as C-class in most categories but in the medicine WikiProject it was rated as Start-class. It is a part of a number of WikiProjects, including Engineering, Professional sound production, Physics/Fluid Dynamics/Acoustics, Environment, Medicine, and South Africa/PSP SA. It is different from how we have discussed noise pollution in class in that it focuses more on the biological effects on marine life for instance, than the theory and more abstract ideas behind noise pollution.

Overall Impressions

Overall, the article feels a bit on the under-developed side in terms of encompassing the entire idea of noise pollution. I think there is a lot of room to talk about how noise pollution in the context we have been discussing it in class. The article's strengths are definitely in the data it presents and the scientific importance. Paul1204 (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Kara Paulsen[reply ]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue

[edit ]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wl2671 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Wl2671 (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Needs elaboration on the following expression

[edit ]

"Other key research in this area can be seen in Fong's comparative analysis of soundscape differences between Bangkok, Thailand and Los Angeles, California, US. Based on Schafer's research....but also demonstrates how different sounds of the soundscape are indicative of class differences in urban environments.". As I couldn't access to the said article by Fong, I just couldn't understand what the paragraph was talking about, can anybody help? Thanks. ThomasYehYeh (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Need elaboration for following wordings

[edit ]

"Locations where the DNL is above 75 dB are considered "Unacceptable" and require approval by the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development". I'm wondering whant the so called approval is for, can anybody help explain. Thanks. ThomasYehYeh (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, is this image acceptable?

[edit ]
Sound Pollution Demonstration

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1bbng (talk • contribs) 04:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /