Talk:Nagoya Protocol
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
| WikiProject icon | Japan Low‐importance | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page reads like (and probably is) a verbatim copy of a document, such as the actual charter (or similar published output) of the Nagoya Protocol. It's not particularly comprehensible to non-domain experts. I'm not quite sure what flags to stick on it, other than the ones like "this article could really use some help". (About the only problem I'm pretty sure does NOT apply is NPOV - seems OK there. :-) It's not an encyclopedia-type entry and it's not particularly helpful -- a really good starter point would be a concise, thoughtful intro w/ definition, domain, scope, and/or summary, etc. (I hope my contribution here is helpful; sorry if I'm off-base and please don't flame me (ducks). :-) A Doon (talk) 20:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC) Reply
- The text for this article was moved by me from the section on the protocol in the article on Convention on Biological Diversity. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Reply
It seems to me that current reference number 4 ("A plea for open science on Zika") should not be included to support concerns about this protocol. It looks like it is referring to laws which existed in Brazil before the protocol was signed. In fact, the reference further links to another source which seems to say that then president of Brazil had signed a law in 2015 to revert this difficulties, and it looks as if this law was in fact following the protocol. User:RAMRashan, you included this reference. Do you have anything to add? Thanks Diegodlh (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC) Reply
Brazil ratified the agreement through Decreto Legislativo 136/2020
Source: https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2020/08/12/publicado-decreto-que-confirma-entrada-do-brasil-no-protocolo-de-nagoia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodie HR (talk • contribs) 12:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Reply
The criticism section is very one-sided, only focussing on the position of reseachers and not the one of the countries of origin who most of the time do not get their share of the benefit as it should be according to the protocol and CBD. Barolome (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Start-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- Start-Class United Nations articles
- Unknown-importance United Nations articles
- WikiProject United Nations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles