Talk:Mr. Incredible
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A00:23C4:8FD0:B901:A126:8803:FDED:1E19 in topic Fixed version about the upcoming Incredibles 2
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mr. Incredible article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
.svg){kind=link}
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation , a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
On 16 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Mr. Incredible. The result of the discussion was Moved.
Can we add his abilities as well? Virman1996 (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- @Virman1996: Yes, that can be added under a section named characterization similar to Violet Parr. ― Kaleeb18 Talk Caleb 18:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved Sceptre (talk) 02:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
– A fictional character should be the primary topic. It is the most only known "Bob Parr" till now. 2001:4455:364:A800:4149:88C:9757:6EC7 (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Update Per reasons below, they're right that the title name should be Bob Parr (TV producer) instead. 2001:4455:364:A800:991A:E11B:6CAE:3765 (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support. As much as I hate placing a fictional character ahead of a living person, the pageviews don't lie, and Bob Parr of The Incredibles is the primary topic. I think Bob Parr (TV producer) would be a better title for the other article, however. 162 etc. (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Comment: No comment on the central question, but if the current article at the base name is moved, "producer" is more appropriate than "contractor" (and lowercase should be used). The suggested title makes him sound like someone you might hire to remodel your house, whereas this guy has received six Primetime Emmy Awards. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support in principle regarding the primary topic but I concur that "producer" is a more suitable dab, and of course it needs to be lower case. Schwede 66 17:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support But other article as producer. ― Kaleeb18 Talk Caleb 01:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support as per above Kpddg (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support 2nd, neutral on 1st, the character gets 4,394 views compared with only 127[] for the contractor but PT swaps can cause problems though less so when there are only 2 topics. The qualifier for the contractor should be lower case if that is being used though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support 1st, Bob Parr (TV producer) for 2nd per above.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Support moving the second one to Bob Parr (TV producer) first as that is a more recognisable profession to contractor. I also agree in moving the fictional character to base name and use a hatnote in case the reader was looking for the producer. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Can you add the internet memes and their unusual long lifespan of this meme? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.167.84 (talk) 00:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
- You got a reliable source to back it up. ― Kaleeb18 Talk Caleb 01:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
- A bit late to the party but... . HenryTemplo (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Reply
- That can be used. ― Kaleeb18 Talk Caleb 13:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Reply
- A bit late to the party but... . HenryTemplo (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Reply
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
in the meme part of the article it should say something, about the other versions of the meme. since there is not only becoming uncanny there is also canny,angry,confused,old,idiot,sad, and more. IPAexpert (talk) 00:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC) Reply
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 04:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC) Reply
Bob Parr → Mr. Incredible – Elastigirl's title is her superhero name, so why not Mr. Incredible? Best to have consistency. —Vozhan (talk • contribs ) 2:50, August 16, 2023 (UTC) 02:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Reply
- Support per the consensus reached at talk:Elastigirl#Requested move 14 May 2022. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.193.235 (talk) 04:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Reply
- Support Similar to my !vote on the Elastigirl one, this is an example of WP:COMMONNAME overriding what their name "technically" is. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Reply
- Support Yes that's the common name. desmay (talk) 22:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC) Reply
- Support, for consistency with character names with Pixar characters which have their own articles, such as Woody and Mater where alternative names are known. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC) Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I made some changes and included some infomation 2A00:23C4:8FD0:B901:A126:8803:FDED:1E19 (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2025 (UTC) Reply
Categories:
- C-Class Disney articles
- Low-importance Disney articles
- C-Class Disney articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- C-Class Computer animation articles
- Mid-importance Computer animation articles
- Computer animation work group articles
- C-Class Pixar articles
- Mid-importance Pixar articles
- Pixar work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles