Talk:Monita Secreta
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books . To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
Tried to clean up the style of this page, although it needs more work in the later sections. I also attempted to make it clear that - based on the scholarly consensus of all cited sources, especially Pavone - the document is regarded as false.
some see it as an essentially accurate portrait by a former Jesuit
[edit ]"Scholars regard the document as an anti-Jesuit forgery." Would it not be more honest to say "Most scholars regard the document as an anti-Jesuit forgery, though some see it as an essentially accurate portrait by a former Jesuit."? Heavenlyblue (talk) 00:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC) [reply ]