Talk:Meat Grinder/GA1
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 days ago by Dragonhawk12 in topic GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: AdobongPogi(talk · contribs) 01:17, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Reviewer: Dragonhawk12(talk · contribs) 06:08, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Dragonhawk12 Thanks for taking the time to review this. You may see my revisions. Please ping me if anything is missing or if you notice any issues. AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 00:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Thank you! There are still issues with the souring. The spot check is below Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 00:39, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Dragonhawk12 I decided to remove source 1 and replace it with source 2. I was unsure how to revise the paragraph based on [1], while source [2] provides Arnon's fellow producer Thawatchai Panpakdee, which I added to the paragraph.
The film was produced by Film Guru Company Ltd, with Poj Arnon and Thawatchai Panpakdee serving as producers.
AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 01:21, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Reply- Everything looks good now. I'll pass the article now. Congrats! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 01:26, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Dragonhawk12 I decided to remove source 1 and replace it with source 2. I was unsure how to revise the paragraph based on [1], while source [2] provides Arnon's fellow producer Thawatchai Panpakdee, which I added to the paragraph.
- Thank you! There are still issues with the souring. The spot check is below Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 00:39, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- See below
- Everything was fixed
- See below
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- All guidelines here are followed.
- A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Sources are laid out correctly
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- The following links are down:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- C. It contains no original research:
- Spot check here
- There are still some issues listed above. You may either reply here or on the spot check page.
- Spot check here
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- highest percentage Earwig gave was a 4.8%. No copyvio here.
- C. It contains no original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- Everything I would want to know about the subject is mentioned.
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral ?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Article is neutral
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- No edit wars present.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images ?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Only image has a valid rational.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- @AdobongPogi: There are still some issues that need to be addressed. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 23:07, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Pass or Fail:
Hello! I'm reviewing this for WP:DCWC. If you have any questions or I biff anything, please tell me!Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 06:08, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Plot:
[edit ]- "Human flesh" is wikilinked in the last sentence but "flesh" in the sentence "Fearing the consequences, she preserves the body with herbs and uses the flesh in her noodles." isn't. I don't think flesh is uncommon enough to be wikilinked, so you don't have to link it.
- "Nida briefly escapes but discovers a dead body while trying to flee." is this relevant to the plot?
Production:
[edit ]- This isn't needed to get the article to GA status, but the list of names (Rattanaballang Tohssawat, Pimchanok Luevisadpaibul, Anuway Niwartwong, Wiradit Srimala, Duangta Tungkamanee, and Jirachaya Jirarachakij) should be alphabetized by last name.
Release:
[edit ]- "United Kingdom" doesn't have to be Wikilinked.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.