Talk:Masked Republic
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Masked Republic is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling , an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Contested deletion
[edit ]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the company is clearly notable and has tons of covergae. The Speedy was added by someone who passed by and saw a stub without giving it a second thought or research.★Trekker (talk) 19:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @*Treker: You'd think that
It is the largest seller of lucha libre related products
is a claim of significance, but apparently not... Adam9007 (talk) 19:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]- @Adam9007: You'd think clear use of references to serval reliable sources would make people realize that it passes GNG. But apparently not... ★Trekker (talk) 19:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
-
*Treker, To some editors, A7 is purely about the content of the article (not the cited sources), and even the subject passing GNG doesn't make the article exempt from A7. Adam9007 (talk) 19:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Adam9007: Those editors are wrong and not following Wikipedia guidelines. An article should not be deleted because it is a stub or has bare urls, that's not how notability is established. Why does Wikipedia even have GNG if people cant just ignore it on a whim?★Trekker (talk) 19:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- I did, as it happens, look at the existing sources in detail and conduct my own search. The sources provided largely regurgitate press releases and in my view do nothing to establish notability. As Adam9007 notes, the point about asserting significance is a little separate to that and is about the content as it stands. In my view, the line about being 'the largest seller of lucha libre related products' was not sufficient, but if I am incorrect then no doubt the CSD request will be refused. Hugsyrup (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Well, there's also the fact it is
(削除) founded (削除ここまで)run by a notable person (which is a WP:CCS despite what some say (they misinterpret WP:NOTINHERITED)), because there's a merge/redirect (an alternative to deletion, which is policy) target, which 9 times out of 10 makes deletion controversial. Adam9007 (talk) 19:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]- Seems to have been removed now. Not sure if it was an admin or what happened.★Trekker (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Well, there's also the fact it is
- I did, as it happens, look at the existing sources in detail and conduct my own search. The sources provided largely regurgitate press releases and in my view do nothing to establish notability. As Adam9007 notes, the point about asserting significance is a little separate to that and is about the content as it stands. In my view, the line about being 'the largest seller of lucha libre related products' was not sufficient, but if I am incorrect then no doubt the CSD request will be refused. Hugsyrup (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Adam9007: Those editors are wrong and not following Wikipedia guidelines. An article should not be deleted because it is a stub or has bare urls, that's not how notability is established. Why does Wikipedia even have GNG if people cant just ignore it on a whim?★Trekker (talk) 19:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
-
*Treker, To some editors, A7 is purely about the content of the article (not the cited sources), and even the subject passing GNG doesn't make the article exempt from A7. Adam9007 (talk) 19:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Adam9007: You'd think clear use of references to serval reliable sources would make people realize that it passes GNG. But apparently not... ★Trekker (talk) 19:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
Categories:
- Stub-Class Professional wrestling articles
- Low-importance Professional wrestling articles
- WikiProject Professional wrestling articles
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- All Websites articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles