Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Three/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Vestrian24Bio in topic GA review

GA review

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 months ago 30 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ZooBlazer(talk · contribs) 17:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio(talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Reply


Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 14:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Vestrian24Bio It has been over 2 weeks. Do you still plan on reviewing the article? -- Zoo Blazer 08:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
Yup, I've begun reviewing and taking down notes, will post in a day or two with a complete review. Vestrian24Bio 13:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
Almost done, posting in a few hours.. Vestrian24Bio 02:50, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Comments

[edit ]

Vestrian24Bio 12:34, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

DUPLINKS removed -- Zoo Blazer


  • Shouldn't the sidebar have the link to the series pages as well, since the Netflix series are included here..
    If you are talking about the part below the infobox, that is something used on all phases, so a separate discussion would be needed outside of this review for that -- Zoo Blazer
    The side bar is just for MCU Phases and projects created by Marvel Studios. The Netflix series are not officially part of the phase nor created by Marvel Studios. They are included at the bottom of the article in a "Related" section because of them retroactively being added to the overall MCU timeline on Disney+, but if you look at the "Infinity Saga" timeline there (or previously when it was by Phases), the Netflix series are not included there. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Could have separate refs for the 2014 Sony Pictures hack.
    Done -- Zoo Blazer
  • The current wording makes it seem like Ant-Man and the Wasp is a sequel to Homecoming.
    Fixed -- Zoo Blazer
  • Why nothing about Far From Home in the Development section.
    Added -- Zoo Blazer
  • Could have more images in the Films section (James Gunn, Taika Waititi, Ryan Coogler etc.)
    Added-- Zoo Blazer
    I have adjusted this, we intentionally reduced the number of images in the Films section because it was too much and there was a lot of repetition between the phase articles. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • First sentence in the second paragraph of the Doctor Strange (2016) section mentions June 2010 twice.
    Fixed -- Zoo Blazer
  • Link MacGuffins, not everyone might be aware of the meaning.
    Done -- Zoo Blazer
  • Could link to the Blip in Ant-Man and the Wasp mid-credits or Endgame synopsis.
    Added to Ant-Man and the Wasp -- Zoo Blazer
  • Ref 189 is about Evans in DP&W, a ref about returing as Steve in Doomsday might be better.
    The ref is just about him returning to the MCU, so I think it is fine since DP&W was his first post-Endgame appearance. -- Zoo Blazer
    I've added a ref for his Doomsday return, good to keep the DP&W as it was the first time. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Could mention Peter's identity being revealed in the Far From Home credits.
    Added -- Zoo Blazer
    I've reverted this change as the focus for these third paragraphs in each film section is on crossovers and easter eggs, not just set-up for the next movie. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Sources for Music and Home media sections..???
    I have copied the sources from the film articles. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Could link to Sony Classical Records directly in the table.
    Done -- Zoo Blazer
  • Could link to SZA directly in the table.
    Done -- Zoo Blazer
  • The character article says Michelle Jones-Watson but, listed here as Watson-Jones..
    Fixed -- Zoo Blazer
  • Could have images of Michael Giacchino and Alan Silvestri for the Music section since they compesed for multiple films (2 & 3 respectively) in phase 3.
    Images don't really fit in that section because of the tables. It would just create a bunch of empty space. -- Zoo Blazer
    I have added an image of Giacchino. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • It might also be worth noting that Giacchino composed the fanfare that debuted with Doctor Strange.
    Noted in the development section, similar to the Phase Two article. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Could use the {{Cite Box Office Mojo }} template for all the films.
    I think something about that messes hings up with the table since it is transcluded, but I may be wrong. -- Zoo Blazer
    I have made this change. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Why Endgame doesn't have a BOM source?
    Adamstom.97 Trailblazer101 Do either of you know if there is a specific reason? -- Zoo Blazer
    Copied from Endgame article. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Typo in second paragraph of Critical and public response section: it says Infinity Way instead of Infinity War.
    Fixed -- Zoo Blazer
  • Why WHIH Newsfront and Team Thor are not linked in the first sentence of the section, but The Daily Bugle is linked?
    Linked -- Zoo Blazer 19:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Vestrian24Bio 12:34, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

@ZooBlazer: that's all I got, ping me when you're done. Vestrian24Bio 12:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
@Vestrian24Bio: I believe ZooBlazer and I have addressed all of your concerns now. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Add author for ref 329; also could use cite tweet instead of cite web.
  • Duplicated refs - 17 & 201.
  • Ref 350 is missing a closing bracket.
All else good. Vestrian24Bio 10:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
Done @Vestrian24Bio. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Final review

[edit ]
  • EARWIG shows 34.2% - violation unlikely.
  • link-dispenser is having some issues running, will check later. - still not working, will finish without it.

Vestrian24Bio 12:35, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

All images have proper copyright tags and alt texts. Vestrian24Bio 10:11, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

All else good, passing for GA. Vestrian24Bio 13:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /