Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Linx (railway company)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article Linx (railway company) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 10, 2010 .
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Linx (train pictured) cited competition from low-cost airlines for terminating their OsloStockholm train service?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon
Sel week 44, 2016
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains , an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transportMid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force .
WikiProject icon Companies Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Sweden Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

[edit ]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Linx (railway company)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nathan2055 talk - review 20:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

The chart

[edit ]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. There was a small problem in the lead, but I fixed it.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral : it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Looks great! It was an awesome article to read. Congratulations! A bot will update the article in about five minutes. 20:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Any time! Thanks, Nathan2055 talk - review 20:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /