Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Kirby (series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-36700-34 in topic Could the table in the Reception section be sortable?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kirby (series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find video game sources:"Kirby"seriesnews · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Video games : Nintendo C‐class High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force .
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
AfDs
Merge discussions
Other discussions
No major discussions
Featured content candidates
Good article nominations
DYK nominations
No did you know nominations
Reviews and reassessments
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
icon The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Random block of text

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

Kirby, a villager in Pupupuland, arrived on Planet Popstar when his rocket ship broke down, causing him to wake up and arrive at Pupupuland 200 years before schedueled. In the TV show, which is called Hoshii no Kaabii, kirby is usually found beating demon beasts sent out by Dedede, eating, or sleeping. In one person's opinion, he sleeps so much because he was supposed to be sleeping for 200 years. His friends are Bun and Fumu, childeren of the Cabinet Minister. His enemy's are usually demon beasts that are purchased and sent out by Dedede to destroy him. He is usally a peaceful creature, but sometimes causes a rukess by annoying the other villagers.

So are you trying to say the the anime is a prequel series to the actual video games? ... You know, that could make some sense if you took some liberties. 208.101.173.66 15:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC):Reply
No, it is not.--75.85.111.141 (talk) 15:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Reply

More unreleased games?

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I remember, in Kirby's Rainbow Resort, that a Kirby game was planned where Kirby would be depicted as much younger. I think it was "Kirby Kids" or something, and I'm pretty sure it was supposed to be for SNES. I guess it would be a prequel to Kirby's Dream Land, or an alternate continuity or something. Now, I don't have an immediate source on it other than Kirby Warrior mentioned it at least once, I think. I know this is the same place that also started the whole "Nightmare possessed Meta Knight" rumor at around the same time, but I think this should be looked into. 208.101.173.66 15:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Reply

Okay, absolutely nothing about Kirby eating other characters?

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm disappointed. It was the strangest and most characteristic part of the series. --HanzoHattori 08:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC) Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Kirbylogo.gif

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Kirbylogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Reply

what are the different Kirbys personitlys

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 months ago 3 comments3 people in discussion

what are they —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbyboy (talkcontribs) 16:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC) the pink one is the leader the yellow one is the smart one the blue one is the rude one the red one is the dumb one the green one is the clean freak the purple is the funny one —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbyboy (talkcontribs) 16:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

I have never seen anyone spell personalities so wrong before 170.52.13.109 (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC) Reply
??? That's not how you use Wikipedia's Talk section. ~2025-37851-60 (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC) Reply

Something to say...

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

Kirby isn't a real platformer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.111.141 (talk) 01:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Reply

Chronology

[edit ]

For a chronology in the series. Let's see......I'm sure that Kirby's Dream Land 1 , 2 , and 3 would be the first three, and that they chronologically precede Kirby's Adventure . --PJ Pete October 3, 2008, 0:21

Impossible

[edit ]
Latest comment: 16 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

As of September 2010...

O_O

This date hasn't happened yet!

It's in the first paragraph, the intro part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.186.236 (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC) Reply


yeah, someone fix this D: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.16.37.6 (talk) 05:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Reply

Kirby's Avalanche

[edit ]
Latest comment: 13 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

It's not possible to click on Kirby's Avalanche from the timeline picture. It's covered up by the title of another game that came out in the same year. Alphius (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Reply

Help citing Kirby's sales.

[edit ]
Latest comment: 12 years ago 2 comments1 person in discussion

Currently, the Kirby series includes a total of over twenty games, and has sold over 30 million units worldwide.

Citation please? -Λίνουξ (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Reply

After some research, I found this. Ignore the flash game thingy and read the text below. It should be useful for some citation. Also see Kirby's Rainbow Resort, with lots of information on each game and more. -Λίνουξ (talk) 08:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirby (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kirby (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Reply

Nomination of Portal:Kirby for deletion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Kirby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kirby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 02:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC) Reply

Jumping back and forth between releases

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Shouldn't we use the first release date for Kirby's Adventure (March '93) instead of randomly jumping to NA? MightyArms (talk) 23:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2020

[edit ]
Latest comment: 5 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Kirby Fighters 2 was released in 2020 and is incorrectly under 2010s under Titles. I'm requesting that there be a new section for the 2020s under Titles. Amffy (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC) Reply

Done JTP (talkcontribs) 20:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC) Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Reply

"Hayweauhdfkjakdahakhaya" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hayweauhdfkjakdahakhaya. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 9#Hayweauhdfkjakdahakhaya until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Reply

Kirby and the Forgotten Land

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 years ago 3 comments2 people in discussion

Why doesn't the new game have a Wikipedia page? 98.118.18.50 (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC) Reply

Not enough information about it has been released yet. Once more is announced and there is more coverage (not just of the game's initial unveiling), an article will be made. TheHumanIntersect (talk) 23:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC) Reply

Other video games have gotten pages with less information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.18.50 (talk) 03:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Reply

Add a "Lore" section

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

even though the lore is too confusing, please add it --Mochi (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Reply

Merger proposal

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago 7 comments7 people in discussion

I propose merging List of Kirby media into Kirby (series). I think the content in List of Kirby media can easily be explained in the context of Kirby (series), and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Kirby (series).~ Arkhandar (message me) 10:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC) Reply

I like having a list of all the games with some information for each to quickly ascertain aspects about each like the release dates and other information. However, it would not be a huge qualm were the list merged as you suggest. ButterCashier (talk) 11:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC) Reply
I find separate lists with quick facts more convenient than having to scroll through everything else on series articles. And the Kirby series is one of the series with a sizeable list of media. Of course it can, but should it? WP:SIZERULE applies here. -Vipz (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC) Reply
  • Oppose One would think that the idea of a featured list being overlapping with a series would have been considered already and found untrue. The series should not have a list of games, but a textual description, that is why separate list articles exist. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 20:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC) Reply
Oppose – The list format fits better as a separate article compared to the prose history of the series article (we could/should probably remove the incomplete list from the series article, though) DecafPotato (talk) 21:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC) Reply
Oppose - For the reasons above. Not to mention that the Games section in this article is just a duplicate of List of Kirby media. ThomasO1989 (talk) 23:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC) Reply
Comment - I was the user who originally brought the List of Kirby media article to FLC back in 2008, so I don't think it's my place to !vote in this matter. One note here is that the general rule of thumb I've seen (a long time ago, may be out of date now) is that a list with more than ten items generally can be split out for this kind of thing -- if we were to re-incorporate all of this information back into this article, it would be needlessly overlong (it seems like the incomplete list of games on this page would reinforce that this content would absolutely destroy the main article here). I'm inclined to keep this and other video game series of similar length separate. Nomader (talk) 23:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

The updated series logo from 2022 currently on the page (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/Kirby_2022_logo.svg/375px-Kirby_2022_logo.svg.png) is not the official series logo. The logo currently on the page is recreated from the 30th anniversary logo (https://kirby.nintendo.com/assets/img/kirby_30.png). The official new logo for the entire series (not just the 30th anniversary) is this: https://kirby.nintendo.com/assets/img/kirby-logo.png

The new logo is used in the titles of the games since Kirby and the Forgotten Land as well as now on the official Kirby website https://kirby.nintendo.com/

This article should feature the proper new logo. Kgdx (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Reply

Done, replaced with File:Kirby Logo (Yellow and Blue).png on all Wikipedias that were using the unofficial logo. -Vipz (talk) 11:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Reply

Units sold (in millions)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

All of the digital games say >1. That begs the question, for digital-only games, would downloads be "units" that were sold? QuicoleJR (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC) Reply

"Martial Arts All-Stars (Kirby)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Martial Arts All-Stars (Kirby) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 16 §Martial Arts All-Stars (Kirby) until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Reply

"Return to dreamland deluxe" doesn't have it's own article and doesn't link to THAT article's footnote

[edit ]
Latest comment: 2 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Currently it links to "Kirby's return to dreamland" for the wii which is already confusing, as the info the reader is expecting is about the nintendo switch version, listed at the bottom of the "development" part of that article. It's quite confusing really, and the link itself doesn't link to that part of the article anyways. Rando339 (talk) 21:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Reply

Thinking

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

When this article meets the status (maybe the six good article criteria ) Will this be a good article or a featured list? i'd love to see it as at least one of these. ~~~~ ((Whatcha gotta say? :) -ThaFDA)) (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Reply

@ThaFDA: If we could get it to that point, it would be a good or featured article. This is an article, not a list. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC) Reply

"Origin-Revolving Hero" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Origin-Revolving Hero has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 27 §Origin-Revolving Hero until a consensus is reached. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC) Reply

"Yggy Woods" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Yggy Woods has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 27 §Yggy Woods until a consensus is reached. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC) Reply

"Whispy Borg" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Whispy Borg has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 27 §Alternative Whispy Woods names and unhelpful lists until a consensus is reached. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC) Reply

I feel like there should be more info about Kirby Air Riders

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

In the last paragraph of the "Development" section, it says "Masahiro Sakurai is set to direct the game" which like, was true, but the game is already out and has been directed by him already...

I feel like this whole paragraph should be updated to make it sound more... current. Also, I feel like calling "Star-Crossed World a "new game mode" is inaccurate.

I would edit this myself... but like, I'm not good at Wikipedia stuff when it comes to adding sources and whatnot. I think changing this section would improve the article, though! Dussyy (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

"king dedede" redirects here?

[edit ]
Latest comment: 5 months ago 5 comments3 people in discussion

why should "king dedede" redirect here? king dedede is a character in the series, but not the series itself. it's like linking Bowser with "super mario franchise"..... there even is probably already a seperate article about king dedede. I know I'm 12 but I'm bringing this up because it really needs to be addressed. ~2025-43877-22 (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

except it's not just needing to be addressed, it interferes with a separate article. ~2025-43877-22 (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
well the more I look the less it seems that there is a "king dedede" article.... ok never mind ~2025-43877-22 (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
Yep, there's no article, so it's left as a redirect. Anyone can decide to write one; if you'd like to, I recommend doing it at Draft:King Dedede. Tessaract2 Hi! 22:45, 27 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
There used to be an article on King Dedede. Check Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Dedede for relevant information. –Vipz (talk) 03:48, 28 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Could the table in the Reception section be sortable?

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, I'm not sure how to format a table so that you can click on the columns to sort by the data in that column or I would edit it myself, but the table in the reception section does not currently have that feature. I think this page would be nicer if the table was sortable :) AriSmith133 (talk) 03:04, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Done. CopperyMarrow15 (talk · edits) 00:34, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Thank you!!! <3 ~2026-36700-34 (talk) 02:55, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Resolving who owns Kirby

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 3 comments3 people in discussion

I was looking at the edit history of this article (oof), and saw that the same anonymous user (under different temporary accounts) engaged in edit warring over who actually owns Kirby. What's clear is HAL Laboratory develops most games in the series, and Nintendo publishes the series. The article, as it is now, seems to paint HAL Laboratory as the sole owner, which I don't think is the case, since both HAL and Nintendo are credited as owners in copyright notices, but I wanted to bring this to a discussion, in hopes that we might possibly settle this once and for all. MannysMyName (talk) 03:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hi MannysMyName, the IP editor quickly went to personal attacks. I hope you'll understand that doesn't make me want to collaborate any further. Back to the topic at hand: I don't know! If HAL owns Kirby, but HAL is a Nintendo second-party developer... I don't have the time to look into this, I'm afraid. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
As someone who wasn't aware of what even happened with the article's edit history, I just wanted to drop by to state that I found a licensing press release regarding a licensing deal Nintendo and HAL signed with a Jakks Pacific subsidiary in early 2021, and it confirmed in fine print that the former two companies do own it. While I have already made the edit (and cited the press release as a source to back it up) before stumbling upon this page, it can be reverted in case further discussion is needed to clarify it. IceWalrus236 (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /