Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Kim Possible

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articles Kim Possible has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review : December 30, 2016. (Reviewed version ).
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kim Possible article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS  · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2 Auto-archiving period: 31 days 
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation , a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Animated television work group .
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Disney Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Television Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television , a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Feminism Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1, 2



This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

New article

[edit ]

Dose anyone want to help with Draft:Kim Possible in film Fanoflionking 21:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC) [reply ]

[edit ]

so, i noticed that you maed an edit to external links on Kim Possible, and i gotta tell you, you were wrong.

the current link for the official site is dead: http://disneychannel.disney.com/kim-possible

this site leads to kim possible site, check it out for yourself: https://movies.disney.com/kim-possible

the "movie" site you were talking about is here: https://movies.disney.com/kim-possible-2019

i dare you go go to all three sites and see my point.--Jetcold0 (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

After reading "Known collectively as Team Possible, Kim and Ron's missions primarily require them to thwart the evil plans of the mad scientist-supervillain duo Dr.Drakken and his sidekick Shego, though they encounter other enemies as well." I found "though they encounter other enemies as well." to be disjointed and redundant considering it already mentioned that their "primary" nemesis are Dr.Drakken and Shego, which insinuates that there are others they encounter. I did remove that part, but I'd love to hear you all's thoughts on this.Toph Baraz (talk) 01:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Middleton Location

[edit ]

The article states that Middleton is in Colorado.

This is NOT specified in Canon. So it should not be in the article. While most of the evidence to support Colorado exists (and I personally subscribe to it in my fan works), the main evidence is a map of Colorado Senor Senior, Sr references in targeting missiles at Middleton, another episode references a map of West Virginia. These conflicting aired canon graphics makes it impossible to *definitively* state Colorado as Middleton's state.

BTW, I'm the Admin for the KimPossible.fandom.com wiki.

Reprise: Middleton cannot be declared as in Colorado, even though I personally subscribe to it.

I looked briefly at the history to see if I could spot when it was added, but I don't have the time for a deep dive. I would simply make the change, but I don't want to be seen as *a vandal* Love Robin (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

I agree. I saw nothing when watching the series that indicated Colorado was the location. Figured Middleton was just some random stateless name of a generic city. Anyway nothing in the article supports Colorado, nothing in the series defines it as being there. I removed it. Was changed from USA with this edit in January 2020. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Reboot

[edit ]

Believe me or not, there has been a possibility about a possible reboot as told by Kim's voice actress Christy Carlson Romano and Entertainment Tonight (ET). 2601:196:4A01:D770:1FC5:26BB:A03D:8117 (talk) 15:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Reboot explication

[edit ]

Geraldo Perez, i just added a source, so why THE HECK DID YOU HAD TO REVERT MY FREAKING EDITS. I JUST EDIT A DAMN RELIABLE SOURCE. 73.182.164.191 (talk) 02:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Because the source didn't support the information added to the article. There was no announcement of any sort made, she hinted at a possibility and it is more her personal aspirations than something official from the production studio who she doesn't even work for let alone speak for. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
I get that, but you should know that i was proving a reliable source. 73.182.164.191 (talk) 04:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
That generally reliable source did not support the information that was added. Whether or not that source is generally reliable isn't the issue here - the source didn't support the information that was added to the article. She made no announcement of any sort, the source reliably reported that she "hinted" at what she hopes is a possibility and it mostly supports that she is trying to drive up support for a sequel, not that there is actually anything happening. This is not the sort of information that belongs in a Wikipedia article. There is nothing solid there to report, she is not an authority tied to the production studio who knows what is going on. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /