Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Joseph Berrios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by HughD in topic GA Review
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph Berrios article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources:Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WPrefs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives : 1 Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Good article Joseph Berrios has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2012 Peer review Reviewed
October 18, 2013 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page .
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritage , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Hispanic and Latino Americans on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latino and Hispanic heritageWikipedia:WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritageTemplate:WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritageLatino and Hispanic heritage
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Illinois Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Chicago Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago , which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American politics task force .
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures .

GA Review

[edit ]
Latest comment: 12 years ago 11 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Berrios/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman(talk · contribs) 04:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

I wasn't planning on reviewing this, but since no one else at GAN seems to care and I'm already doing a copyright check on this article, might as well kill two birds with one stone. Wizardman 04:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

Thanks. Hugh (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

Going through all the references over the next 24-48 hours to check both for reliability and copyright issues. That'll be the crux of the review once that's finally done. I did some a while back so I've made progress already. Wizardman 01:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

The copyright issues are now resolved. Here are the concerns I found in the article:

  • The last ref is a deadlink; fix or remove.
[画像:Green tick]Y Removed. Hugh (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply
  • The personal life section would be better combined with the rest of the article. It's the type of article where having that extra section, especially with so little in it, seems pointless.
[画像:Green tick]Y Combined. Hugh (talk) 04:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply
  • There is a one sentence paragraph in the article; combine it in so it's not hanging.
[画像:Green tick]Y Combined. Hugh (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply
  • The lead it a little on the small side given the size of the article, though that's more personal preference than anything.
[画像:Green tick]Y Lead expanded. Hugh (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

Article's now on hold, just make those fixes and I'll pass it. Wizardman 02:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

Everything checks out, article now passes. Wizardman 14:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Reply
Thank you. Hugh (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /