Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:John Anderson (philosopher)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Bjenks in topic Freethought Society
This article is written in Australian English , which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject icon Australia : Education Low‐importance What's this? at the National Library of Australia."}">icon Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help\"@\"wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance."}">icon
WikiProject icon John Anderson (philosopher) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia , which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as High-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help[画像:@]wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject icon Philosophy : Philosophers / Aesthetics / Metaphysics / Contemporary Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Aesthetics
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anderson and the CP

[edit ]
Latest comment: 19 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

I query the statement in para 2 that Anderson became a member of the Communist Party. I have always understod that he was a frequenter of CP meetings, to the point of dominating them, but without being formally a member. The ADB says "he associated with the communist movement. He wrote for their journals, sometimes under a nom-de-plume, but became disillusioned with the Stalinist party-line".[1] When he eventually saw through the Stalin régime, he simply parted company with Lance Sharkey and fellows. This is just one item which could benefit from a citation--Bjenks 05:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

Good call. I've adjusted the wording to reflect the info in one of the existing external links but have left your citation request in place as some further parts of this par may benefit from further reference support? --Wm 09:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

Triffic, that satisfies my query, though I agree the tag can stay there in the hope that a suitable ref can be found.

References

Next: Anderson and the Push

[edit ]
Latest comment: 19 years ago 2 comments1 person in discussion

I'm not happy with the statement Anderson was a significant figure in the group of intellectuals known as the Sydney Push . It's misleading in that (a) it implies Anderson was a 'member' or associate of the Push--which is quite untrue in my experience; and (b) only some of the Push could be called intellectuals. A much greater number of others were anti-intellectuals, artists, musos, journos, crims, sexual opportunists, etc. Before John's retirement in 1958, the Libertarian Society held its weekly meetings in the Psychology Room. That was specifically because John did not approve of Jim Baker's breakaway group from the former Free Thought Society. More than once at lunchtime I witnessed Anderson entering or leaving his study (which was next door) and casting a distasteful gaze on those coming or going from the Libertarian meeting. Only after his retirement were meetings able to be held in the nearby Philosophy Room--the preferred venue. There was (to a newcomer like myself) something quite mysterious about why such a gulf should exist between people with almost identical views about politics and morality, etc. But the fact is that Anderson never attended any Libertarian or Push gathering. He was held in respect but not love by his libertarian disciples. We had a lot of fun singing his wonderful pet songs, such as Professor John Glaister but he was never there, not in the '50s, and older Push habitués like Lex Banning, Dick Appleton and Harry Peters never alluded to his being there in the '40s. --Bjenks 13:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

The last expansion and changes to the article were mine--I forgot to sign in. Bjenks 11:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Reply

Jim Baker

[edit ]
Latest comment: 16 years ago 2 comments1 person in discussion

I would like to start an article on Jim Baker in view of his central importance to the Sydney Push and to the teachings of John Anderson. It may be that his notability will be questioned but, imho, he deserves equal ranking with David Armstrong, David Stove, J. L. Mackie and Eugene Kamenka, who each have separate biogs. Comment is invited. Bjenks (talk) 01:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

Coming back to this, I note with approval that there is now a stub on A J (Jim) Baker. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Anderson (philosopher). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Reply

Freethought Society

[edit ]
Latest comment: 5 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I've recently had occasion to study J. G. Packer's exhaustive Andersonian bibliography (now added to the Bibliography section of the article) from which is clear that Freethought was always one word in the society's title. The SMH got it wrong in citation 11. This is confirmed by the usage of former Society member Jim Baker in this article. Bjenks (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /