Talk:Inferential role semantics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Article merged: See old talk-page here —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrideOfKripkenstein (talk • contribs) 04:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
comment
[edit ]I don't think the linked paper by Ned Block is a defense of CRS, in fact quite the opposite. The paper should be reviewed to ensure he is actually a proponent of the position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.189.33 (talk • contribs)
- It is difficult to tell because the paper lacks a complete bibliography. However, if we assume that when Ned Block is referring to himself when he uses the name "Block", then the first paragraph would seem to be a dead giveaway. In any case, the linked article has not been framed in any way at all in this stub, which makes the inquiry moot { Ben S. Nelson } 03:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
Categories:
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosophy of language articles
- Low-importance philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- Stub-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles