Talk:Ideogrammic method
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Formatting
[edit ]Does
ROSE
CHERRY
IRON RUST
FLAMINGO
need to be formatted like that?Is is Is 20:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
- This is how it is formatted in Pound's ABC of Reading so I'd rather leave it that way. Maybe it is significant; at least it seems that it was significant to Pound. — Stumps 23:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
By God..., I'd like to see this ideogram. Wouldn't an image be important? --Leonardo T. de Oliveira 02:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- I don't recall if Pound showed ideaograms in his texts explaining this idea ... possibly so, although I have no recollection of an ideogram for red as set out here. This article is about Pound's theory of how concrete images can be used in poetry to convey abstractions ... he was against - at least in theory - the ue of abstract words in poetry. "Go in fear of abstractions" he wrote somewhere. An image in the article would be nice, but I don't think it's essential. Stumps 03:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC) [reply ]