Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:I Have a Dream

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I Have a Dream article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS  · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
This article is written in American English , which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 12 dates. [show]
This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Civil Rights Movement High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
To-do list for I Have a Dream:
No to-do list assigned.
WikiProject Civil Rights Movement to do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Georgia (U.S. state) : Atlanta High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state)
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Atlanta task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon United States : District of Columbia / History Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject icon Library of Congress Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject icon African diaspora Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Politics : American High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject icon Linguistics High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Literature High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Human rights High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Philosophy : Social and political Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Social and political philosophy
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:


Dr. King's later thoughts on the speech

[edit ]

Having quickly glanced through the article, I've noticed that there is an absence regarding Dr. King's later thoughts on the speech (particularly those he reiterated in his 1967 interview with Sander Vanocur). To summarize, he said that his 'dream' has "...at many points turned into a nightmare..." and regarded the speech as overly optimistic, in light of the resistances to further civil rights advancements and the Vietnam War, both of which he viewed as parts of or results of the evils (his 'Triple Evils' as he called them) he thought the USA was complicit in. All in all, he had essentially disavowed his speech - prior to directly commenting on the speech, he mentioned that integration as a sole focus of the Civil Rights movement wasn't enough without a "revolution of values" and quoted James Baldwin, saying "What advantage is there in being integrated into a burning house?" The interview can be found here. With all of that said - considering this interview, as well as Dr. King's later stances prior to the end of his life, I believe this should be noted in the article under the 'Legacy' section. Also something of note is how it is often misconstrued by modern-day conservatives as an advocacy of solving racism via a 'colorblind' approach to society (rather than seeing 'colorblindness' as an end goal to strive towards). I can understand the latter not being included but I think it is important for the article to include King's own later thoughts on the speech as a good way to show what he thought about the progress made during that time. Kyle Tatum (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

The sentence "Taylor Branch writes that King later said he grasped at the "first run of oratory" that came to him, not knowing if Jackson's words ever reached him.[7]" is used twice in completely different parts of the document.

[edit ]

someone should probably fix that 65.199.249.162 (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /