Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Hydrostatic test

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
AS/NZS 3788 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 October 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Hydrostatic test. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving , an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

It is fallacious to talk of pipelines as "lower pressure". Many pipelines currently operate at pressures in the 2000-4000psi (15-30MPa) pressure range.

"Pipeline hydrostatic tests are normally carried out at a minimum of 1.25 x operating pressure, not 1.5." -- This is wrong. According to ASME B16.5, hydrostatic pressure is equivalent to 1.5 times the stress ratio of hot/cold times the design pressure. It has nothing to do with 1.25 or the operating pressure.


Currently National Grid in the UK are testing a new pipeline and its associated AGI's to 150% of maximum operating pressure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.133.224.124 (talk) 12:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]


This is a very poor article. For example, 150% is not 1.3. Also note that ASME VIII Div 1 is the bible for pressure testing of pressure vessels - 1.3 X maximum allowable working pressure. I've never heard of testing by volume change - it is by pressure loss or leak. "Rejection Elastic Expansion" shows a clear lack of knowledge of "permanent deformation". Elastic Expansion means it will return to its original shape. Any rejection would have to be to "Inelastic Expansion", although I have never heard of this criteria.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /