Talk:Hotel Dusk: Room 215

They also made a similar DS game Trace Memory. The gameplay seems familiar, and the idea of using DS-exclusive things is the same.

we know 75.26.204.113 00:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

It's been released, or at least dumped. Removed future game heading

The article seems quite long already. 74.98.147.239 02:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Reply

That tag was put up before the game was released, when the article had little to no content in it. It will probably remain there until enough people believe that the article has been sufficiently expanded.--Hailinel 03:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Reply

I know the plot and character sections are marked, but the section taken from the manual or otherwise, which are technically spoiler free, weren't separated from the spoilers that fill most of the article. For this sort of game especially spoilers should be marked, as the entire point is to discover the very things mentioned in the article as you play through.

The WP:SPOILER policy for Wikipedia has been updated after lengthy debate over the last few weeks, and basically for article sections that are labeled as part of the plot or story should not be marked as "spoilers" because the section title implicitly carries this information. --Masem 13:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Reply

That's stupid. (ANONYMOUS) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Momus (talk • contribs) 03:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Reply

Kyle just brought it up as a question. For all we know, they could've been having a lengthy discussion. Am I right or am I wrong?

Right. Bradley, anyway, told Dunning that he wouldn't see Robert Evans again, hinting that Bradley killed Evans at some point. 82.59.74.179 11:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Reply

is there a sequel? my friend said theres a sequel where the story is completely different but the game play is the same and stuff but i think he is lying and trying to get my hopes up... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.98.189 (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Reply

Hotel Dusk does not have a sequel, and no announcement has been made regarding one. However, the game was made by the same studio that previously made the DS game Trace Memory, which has similar gameplay, but the story and characters are completely unrelated.--75.92.186.211 (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Reply

I suppose it could be thought that since there was a re-release on September 10th 2008 or so, that the confusion could come in. However, I can't tell the difference from the January 22, 2007 release and the September 10th, 2008 other than the packaging (I think it says "interactive mystery novel" on the September version, but that's all). 24.86.143.192 (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

Seems to just be a Player's Choice title, it also came with a price drop. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

- It establishes the unique visuals and how they are animated. Assuming we get a section on its visuals. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

We'd need to have a good commentary or development section on the approach to the visuals (I'm not sure what the style is called, it's similar to Take Me On's video but not given a name there, so we're not seemingly duplicating anything). --MASEM 17:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

can t figure out how to get combination from under cab. in main office —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.4.199.43 (talk) 07:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Reply

here. Will try to add later if possible. --MASEM (t) 20:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Reply

I noticed in the edit summaries that someone is repeatedly trying to add a walkthrough to this article as part of a school project. Professors having their students edit Wikipedia is not unusual, but we still ask that you try to follow the rules as much as you can. For example, a walkthrough for a video game is frowned on by WP:GAMEGUIDE. Out of curiosity, what class are you taking that requires you to post a walkthrough for a video game? Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Reply

this is hilarious - 220.245.253.81 (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC) Reply

The article's TOC claims there to be a story section. But the section in question drones on and on about what happened before the game. The actual story of the game is missing. --94.134.217.127 (talk) 09:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC) Reply

I tried to clean up/organize the plot synopsis on the article but I honestly think everything under oszerzone paintings could be summarized in two or three lines, and it would improve the article significantly. Anyone have thoughts? Jackmerius Tacktheratrix (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC) Reply

You've removed a whole lot of it, does it really make sense to boil down the game's story to just one paragraph that covers little of the plot? Tayuro (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Reply

I didn't think it made sense to describe every minute detail but rather to give a broad overview to the plot. Jackmerius Tacktheratrix (talk) (contribs) 19:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Reply

Plot summaries should be comprehensive but still remain concise, so that much reduction is inappropriate. The target is a plot summary between 400 and 700 words. Masem (t) 19:36, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Reply

I thought it was too detailed but you're welcome to restore the previous version if you think it's better. Jackmerius Tacktheratrix (talk) (contribs) 19:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Reply