Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Hollaback Girl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by The Squirrel Conspiracy in topic Did you know nomination
Former featured article Hollaback Girl is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good article Hollaback Girl has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Hollaback Girl is part of the Love. Angel. Music. Baby. series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 13, 2007.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 13, 2005 Peer review Reviewed
November 28, 2005 Featured article candidate Not promoted
December 1, 2005 Featured article candidate Not promoted
December 2, 2005 Good article nominee Listed
January 2, 2006 Featured article candidate Not promoted
January 4, 2006 Peer review Reviewed
January 29, 2006 Good article reassessment Delisted
January 22, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
January 22, 2007 Peer review Reviewed
January 31, 2007 Featured article candidate Promoted
May 9, 2007Featured topic candidate Promoted
June 16, 2010Featured topic removal candidate Demoted
September 20, 2011Featured topic candidate Not promoted
March 13, 2016 Featured article review Demoted
September 7, 2016 Good article nominee Not listed
June 5, 2020 Peer review Reviewed
June 21, 2020 Good article nominee Listed
July 31, 2020Good topic candidate Promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 3, 2020 .
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Gwen Stefani's song "Hollaback Girl " was the first single ever to sell more digital downloads than CDs?
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hollaback Girl article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources:Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WPrefs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives : 1
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Songs
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
WikiProject icon Gwen Stefani High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Hip-hop Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop , a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Women in hip-hop Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in hip-hop , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Women in hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Women in hip-hopWomen in hip-hop
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Women in Music Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Remixes

[edit ]
Latest comment: 11 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

There's one more remix you might have to add to the list. I remembered there being a 12" vinyl of a Fingazz remix featuring singer/rapper Diamonique. Given the age of the song, the vinyl of it may have already disappeared; however, the remix does appear on Fingazz's discography. ElMeroEse (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Reply

FAR might be needed

[edit ]
Latest comment: 11 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

From a glance, I'm not sure this is up to FA-standards. The lead doesn't include genres, critics' opinions, or anything on the music video. The "track listings" section is unreferenced, and so is most of "In pop culture". I'm also not sure if the audio samples are really beneficial. I'll check back in a week or so to see if any improvements have been made. Otherwise, I will list this at FAR. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Hollaback Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hollaback Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hollaback Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Reply

Peer review the fourth

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I plan on taking this article back to WP:PR, but I already have another article waiting to be responded to – once that's out, I'll put mine in. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 16:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Reply

Did you know nomination

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)07:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Reply

DYK toolbox

Improved to Good Article status by Thatoneweirdwikier (talk). Self-nominated at 15:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC).Reply

  • Substantial article, meeting of GA criteria implicates DYK pass. Article was promoted to Good status within 7 days of nomination. Editor is QPQ exempt. Hook is interesting, cited, and short enough for DYK. I will note that DYK does get an abundance of "[article] was the first [blank]" hooks submitted so editors occasionally recommend that nominators submit one or two alternate hooks, but I personally think this hook is interesting enough to stand on its own. Morgan695 (talk) 04:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /