Talk:High-explosive incendiary
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
| WikiProject icon | Military history : Technology / Weaponry Start‐class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
[edit ]Duplicate information, please fix it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.24.200 (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
The interwiki links are all wrong. I tried to fix it, but some stupid bot keeps reverting them. /83.227.130.26 (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
Requested move 29 December 2015
[edit ]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 14:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
High explosive incendiary → High-explosive incendiary – Hyphenation of a compound modifier. Other articles are so hyphenated, such as High-explosive squash head and High-explosive anti-tank warhead. Chris the speller yack 02:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
(削除) Oppose (削除ここまで): I don't think this is necessary at all. High is an adjective of explosive in this case and therefore should (and maybe even can) not be separated with a hyphen. TheJack15 (talk) 05:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]- Striking confirmed sock. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support clarifying hyphenation. Some books are generous enough to help their readers that way. Dicklyon (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support per WP:HYPHEN as a compound modifier. kennethaw88 • talk 22:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Complete Rewrite Needed
[edit ]...No citations, bizarre misconceptions such as chobham armor and ERA "absorbing" incendiary effects.
If I have time then I'll get around to fixing it myself. Dominic 41 (talk) 16:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Categories:
- Stub-Class Explosives articles
- Unknown-importance Explosives articles
- Stub-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles