Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Helicoid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

It said "cylindrical coordinates;" I changed this to Cartesian and linked it, since it is a parametrization leading to (x, y, z) not (r, T, h), obviously. (Sorry, wasn't logged in. -- entropix)

unclear sentence

[edit ]

Could someone explain what exactly the following sentence mean? "Since it is considered that the planar range extends through negative and positive infinity, close observation shows the appearance of two parallel or mirror planes in the sense that if the slope of one plane is traced, the co-plane can be seen to be bypassed or skipped, though in actuality the co-plane is also traced from the opposite perspective." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.112.54.158 (talk) 02:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Err, it was described by Euler...

[edit ]

... in 1774.

refimprove VS unsourced

[edit ]

This article DOES have a single reference / citation (though at the bottom, the relevant section is currently titled "notes") As such, I would like to gently urge fellow wikipedia editors out there: Please use {{refimprove}} where appropriate in place of misuing {{Unreferenced}} (the later of which is meant for articles with ZERO citations) --Kuzetsa (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

I took the liberty to remove the {{refimprove}} as for two years nobody has neither argued against the contents nor added references, and as one reference seem perfectly sufficient. Bo Jacoby (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC).[reply ]

Infinite by definition

[edit ]

Article says: "The helicoid is shaped like Archimedes' screw, but extends infinitely in all directions."

I wonder if this is quite right? On Wolfram math world (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Helicoid.html) it's described as "The (circular) helicoid is the minimal surface having a (circular) helix as its boundary.", and their parametrization mentions nothing about infiniteness.

If no one objects I'm changing this. --Riyaah (talk) 07:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

If you truncate it, it can no longer be called a ruled surface. Tkuvho (talk) 09:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

File:Helicatenoid.gif to appear as POTD soon

[edit ]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Helicatenoid.gif will be appearing as picture of the day on November 13, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-11-13. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 00:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

An illustration of how two mathematical surfaces, the helicoid and the catenoid , may be transformed into one another. This transformation is a local isometry. The catenoid was the first minimal surface to be discovered, by Leonhard Euler in 1744. Jean Baptiste Meusnier discovered the helicoid in 1766, and its name derives from its similarity to a helix.Image: Wickerprints

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /