Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Gulf Stream

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Skip to table of contents
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gulf Stream article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives : 1 Auto-archiving period: 6 months
Former good article Gulf Stream was one of the Geography and places good articles , but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 7, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
September 21, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept
January 6, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept
August 9, 2023 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Oceans Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Limnology and Oceanography Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Weather : Tropical / Non-tropical / General High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather , which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject icon United States Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

icon To-do list for Gulf Stream: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2018年05月09日


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Text or other creative content from this version of Benjamin Franklin was copied or moved into Gulf Stream with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit ]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 3 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angerine01.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

"there is consensus"

[edit ]

The heading of the article claims that there is consensus about the gulf stream and then doesn't provide a single citation for that claim. Claiming consensus feels a bit bold, but doing it without *any* citations seems like a huge mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CD01:F090:79CF:65B7:823A:16D1 (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Guardian: Climate crisis, Scientists spot warning signs of Gulf Stream collapse

[edit ]

I'm unsure how to include this in the article but seems very important, please can someone check it and include?

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

@John Cummings: Another recent study found that the Gulf Stream may collapse in less than a decade, possibly as early as 2025. Jarble (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Suggestion to remove "renewable power generation" section

[edit ]

The Gulf Stream's potential for renewable power generation is not significant enough to warrant its own section in this article, at least not at this point in time. The articles cited in this section are academically interesting (primarily the Yang et al. (2013) paper, none of the other references add much beyond this) but there is no significant/large-scale project underway to exploit the Gulf Stream as an energy source. A layperson reading this article may leave with the impression that this is a serious undertaking, when this is not the case. Scleractinian (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

deleted Chidgk1 (talk) 12:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

GA Reassessment

[edit ]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Delisted on consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

This was last reassessed in 2009. Quite a lot of research into this subject with regard to climate change has happened since and I don't think this article has completely kept up with it. There is also a [vague] template which needs to be addressed. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

  • Delist (but ping me if anyone is willing to work on the article). There are quite a few reverted comments in the article history, which suggests edit-warring has been happening. Article seems likely to be outdated despite sources being added since the review, and there are some uncited statements. I can't tell whether the article needs quick fixes or more of an overhaul, so am leaning towards the latter. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

AMOC article says AMOC shutdown will cool British Isles

[edit ]

This article suggests it won’t. Doug Weller talk 20:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /