Talk:Gray-bellied night monkey
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America
Range of species
[edit ]The IUCN, seems to say the 4 subspecies are in 3 Central American countries and Colombia. Any verification? ...Mmcannis 17:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- MSW3 says this species is in Panama, Equador, and Colombia. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- The Taxonomy chapter of "New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates", of which Groves is a co-author, seems to back off from this. Apparently a study by Defler in 2001 (which I believe is subsequent to MSW3; at least it appears to be from the way the chapter is written) concluded that A. zonalis is a separate species. So, we may want to consider using the subsequent taxonomy on this, instead of following MSW3. I started an article on A. l. zonalis presuming subspecies status (but noting the controversy), so the taxonomy in that article may also need to be reconsidered. Rlendog (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Msw3 was published in 2005, although mostly written in 2003, so the 2001 paper by Defler is older even than that. I'll ask Groves his thoughts on the genus. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Ah.... I'd already asked him about Aotus: "In as far as anything can be settled, yes. In my book, hence in MSW 3 (which was delayed for two years between completion of the manuscript and publication), I think I was much too much of a lumper in Aotus. Defler, in his publications and discussions, has convinced me that it is all much more complicated in Colombia than I had thought. And this is not the last word either (the question of the identity of the "real" lemurinus, for example, is still not settled, and it looks like there may be a new species to be described), but of course we have to report to the wide world from time to time, and somehow to make it clear that discoveries are still being made." So it looks like the best thing to do is to hold on until something new is published, but we can note that things are more complicated and that the taxonomy is fluid. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]