Talk:Gobiesocidae
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Fishes , an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life .FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors :
- [[Color#Physics of color|long wave-length colours]] The anchor (#Physics of color) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an errorClassification
[edit ]I would like to change the classification in the taxbox to comply with the International Standards rather than Fishbase, which bases its classification off of one book by Joseph S. Nelson. The listing of Esociformes in ITIS is listed as invalid. Esoxid (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
United States for ichthyology?
[edit ]What is this? It's under the paragraph Classification. GrahamBould (talk) 21:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- If I understand you correctly, you are asking if that is some sort of organization. I suppose it does look ambiguous. I was attempting to state that ITIS is the more official system in the US, and actually North America I think. I'll remove the 'ichthyology' to make it less ambiguous. Esoxid (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Isn't Fishbase's classification leading? Dryke (talk) 14:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC) [reply ]