Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:GigE Vision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2 April 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Computing : Networking Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Advertisement?

[edit ]
Latest comment: 11 years ago 3 comments3 people in discussion

This article is blatent advertisement. also, the "standard" seems closed, with no way to know how to retrieve the specification for the GigE Vision, the link at the end of the page points to a page which only advertise the "standard".

This standard cannot be "based on the Internet Protocol standard": this does not mean anything technologically speaking. the Internet Protocol defines a protocol, that is a way to organize data. each IP frame contains data, those data can also be structured to define an underlying protocol (this is the case for TCP or UDP for example), the embedded protocol can also contain structured data to define another protocol (such as HTTP or SMTP). so GigE Vision would better qualify as a protocol (but i cannot verify this claim since i cannot access any paper defining the technology). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.148.242.168 (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC) Reply

Very much agree this is an advertisement. Would ask commentators if they work for Raben Group to abstain from further edits. In line with the above intend to radically change this page. Not sure its worthy of a Wiki Page. Richie1921 (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Reply

I restored the "technology" section - a factual listing of the technologies is not an advert. I likewise restored the "See also" section which links to articles on related topics (per WP:MOS). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GigE Vision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /