Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Gabi Moura

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Jishara in topic Did you know nomination
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gabi Moura article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources:Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WPrefs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page .
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Biography
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject icon Fashion Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Brazil Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Internet culture Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon TikTok
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject TikTok , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of TikTok on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TikTokWikipedia:WikiProject TikTokTemplate:WikiProject TikTokTikTok
WikiProject icon United States Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon YouTube Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject YouTube To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Women
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Did you know nomination

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 8 comments3 people in discussion

Moved to mainspace by Knightoftheswords281(talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

— Knightof theswords 03:03, 1 July 2026 (UTC).Reply

  • @Knightoftheswords281: Very many unreliable sources here; this should not be using Legit.ng, TMZ, NY Post, The Blast, The Tab, Elite Daily, Headline Planet, The Express, The Sun, or Distractify at least, and I have serious doubts about the sports outlets as well. So many unreliable sources in fact, that I have draftified this and as such I'm rejecting this.--Laun chba ller 07:36, 1 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
    • @Launchballer: I object to your draftication and have BOLDly moved it back into the main space. Consensus has found that NY Post is marginally reliable for entertainment-related content, and TMZ is in a similar category. From checking discussion on WP:RSN, The Tab is also considered marginally reliable (and even then, the source used was an opinion piece used to illustrate reactions to her VSFS walk), and there is no consensus on Elite Daily or The Blast. Legit.ng, Headline Planet, The Express (linked via an AOL page, which is why I didn't notice), and Distractify, and The Sun are considered unreliable, but these were one off citations that in most cases existed to pad citations for a specific claim; the Sun, Distractify, citation, and Headline Planet citations were all single citations supported by other sources and could have been resolved via simply deleting them. This leaves only the legit.ng and Express articles; given that the former was only used to cite her measurements, I'll remove the model infobox which was its only purpose. For the latter, I already wasn't able to find good sources for it, and given it's basically a nothing statement ("we don't have a dress code, but dress to impress!"), I'll remove it as well. These were issues that could have been addressed here and were nowhere near being bad enough to warrant a unilateral namespace moving, and the subject easily meets notability standards per WP:NMODEL. — Knightof theswords 10:20, 1 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /