Talk:Fang La
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
|auto= parameter.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water Margin, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .Water MarginWikipedia:WikiProject Water MarginTemplate:WikiProject Water MarginWater Margin
untitled
[edit ]My de:Cihai is reading Fang La. --77.130.43.244 (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
The name is indeed Fang La. Please refer to my post in the WikiProject Water Margin talk page. The reason it was posted there was I am still new to editing in here.
Timluo (talk) 05:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
方la还是方xi
[edit ]今天去图书馆查了查,发现读方xi应该是错的,正确的写法确实是方臘而不是方腊,这样毫无疑问应该念方la。
1.某版本《中国历史》中收录的《折可存墓志铭》照片上面写的是方臘。我照相技术差,反光变白了,网上暂时没有搜到相片。 2.中华书局1975年版《宋史·佞幸》卷四百七十"睦寇方臘起,黼方文太平。"有人可能说现代书籍不足为凭,浙江古籍出版社白衲本影印本宋史此处同样也是作方臘。--刻意(Kèyì) 08:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- The Chinese Wikipedia page says it's "Fang Xi", but no supporting references are provided. I've removed that footnote. _LDS (talk) 13:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]