Talk:Family Wars
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games , an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Notability tag
[edit ]Regarding the addition of the notability tag, all three of the listed sources provide significant coverage of the topic. No issue with considering the two Paper Mayhem articles as one since they are the same (削除) author (削除ここまで) magazine (although different author), but that still leaves two sources with adequate coverage from different magazines and authors. They meet the guideline in Wikipedia:One hundred words as below.
- Stewart Wieck, "The PBM Reviews: Family Wars", White Wolf, No. 10, pp. 54–55. (~1400 words)
- Patrick O. Dick, "PBM Capsule: Family Wars", Paper Mayhem, No. 21, p. 31. (~500 words)
- David Webber, "Family Wars", Paper Mayhem, No. 32, pp. 14–15. (~1900 words)
It is true that the article does not provide very many inline citations from these sources, and so I will change the tag to reflect that. But the listed sources are sufficient for notability, IMO. Airborne84 (talk) 23:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]