Talk:Esophageal pH monitoring
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Esophageal pH monitoring.
- PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles )
- The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine .
- Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine , which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine .MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
DID A PHYSICIAN WRITE THIS?
[edit ]If medical articles aren't written and signed by qualified medical experts, they should be deleted. The wrong information could be extremely harmful. People that are not M.D.'s and PhD's in medicine have no business writing articles about something on which they have little real expert knowledge. Wiki pseudo experts don't cut it. 75.217.247.203 (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Wow, so glad you're not in charge of Wikipedia policy, because I'd actually like a less technical explanation of this.. where do they stick the catheter? --72.211.147.156 (talk) 00:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
Is there a gold standard?
[edit ]The first paragraph says "Esophageal pH monitoring is the current gold standard for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).", but then the "Clinical application" section says "Although there remains no gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD,...". Seems like mixed messages. ThePedanticPrick (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]