Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Ernst Kummer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Biography : Science and Academia
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group .
WikiProject icon Mathematics High‐priority
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
High This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

Untitled

[edit ]

Hi,

I apologize for my comment referring to the section I removed as vandalism (the proof of the infinitude of primes). It seems the proof comes from Ribenboim's new book on prime number records. I am still convinced however that such a triviality should not appear so prominently in the article on a great mathematician as Kummer. It is merely a curiosity, not relating to any of Kummer's actual achievements. I've now reverted the removal. I maintain that it doesn't belong on this page, but I guess the authors of this article should have a say in it. I suggest to replace the section with a link to http://primes.utm.edu/notes/proofs/infinite/kummers.html

I was just about to come to this page to post a question why this proof is here when I saw someone already had. It is not exactly a triviality, but is virtually identical to Euclid's famous and much older proof of the same thing, except for the replacement of n + 1 by n - 1. It's not clear what to do with it; if it's in Ribbenboim's book then it's (sadly) now notable, but on the other hand, it really isn't. Ryan Reich 21:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC) [reply ]

Box

[edit ]

In the box on the right, only Bessel functions are mentioned. Actually, Kummer made many other contributions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.147.112.221 (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

They are now mentioned in the box, vaguely.
[edit ]

The external link said to lead to Mathworld actually links to a different site.

The wrong reference has now gone.

Article summary?

[edit ]

The first part - before the contents - says: Ernst Eduard Kummer (29 January 1810 – 14 May 1893) was a German mathematician. Skilled in applied mathematics, Kummer trained German army officers in ballistics; afterwards, he taught for 10 years in a gymnasium, the German equivalent of high school, where he inspired the mathematical career of Leopold Kronecker.

Is this a summary of the article? The second sentence lists precisely the less important characteristics of Kummer's life and personality. I propose to strike it out.HarDan (talk) 13:28, 4 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

Also, it seems to me that Lomonosov University is mentioned (in the box on the right) by mistake - I have not found any mention of it in any other source on Kummer. If someone thinks this is correct, please comment.HarDan (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /