Talk:Entrust
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | |||||||||||||||
| WikiProject icon | Computer security : Computing | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- Entrustpr2020(talk · contribs) has been paid by Entrust. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
This page needs a disambiguation page linking to ENTRUST the UK Regulator of the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme - but i don't know how this is done. The Yowser (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Reply
- I do know how this is done, but cannot find an article on the UK Entrust. When this exists, either add the template {{For }} or create a new disambig page. HairyWombat 18:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Reply
This article has very little substance as it contains barely any information relevant and significant to the general public. It is clearly not up to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and independence but, to the contrary, appears to have been authored by Entrust's marketing department, glorifying the company and its current CEO's merits. -- HH 92.228.51.180 (talk) 23:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Reply
- Tagged it for neutral point-of-view. While not disputing your suspicions about the article's provenance, you might find a number of wikipedia articles, especially commercial and company articles, that have these issues. Could it be improved from this base of information to a more encyclopedic state?Cander0000 (talk) 20:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC) Reply
It would seem based on your comment, removal of the CEO section and potentially the first paragraph of the proceeding section would help in addressing your concern. --DallasSecurity (talk) 03:41, 7 December 2012 (UTC) Reply
- 5 years later, removing the tag. This article could use a lot of work to be more informative (including reversing the history section and adding info on how it came from Nortel/BNR, and what has happened since going private), but neutrality appears to have been resolved, and whatever objectionable glorification of the then CEO has vanished. Martinp (talk) 04:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Reply
I could not find anywhere a reference to Nortel, which is the origin of the company. This has been added to the top section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vola31 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Entrust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130115002447/http://www.entrust.com/contact/offices.htm to http://entrust.com/contact/offices.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130115002443/http://www.entrust.com/corporate/factsheet.htm to http://entrust.com/corporate/factsheet.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140301075039/http://www.rockefeller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=adea1053-ddc9-438e-9be2-34b179380dec to http://www.rockefeller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=adea1053-ddc9-438e-9be2-34b179380dec
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090329002914/http://www.computerworld.com:80/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Intellectual_Property_and_DRM&articleId=9001907&taxonomyId=144&intsrc=kc_li_story to http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Intellectual_Property_and_DRM&articleId=9001907&taxonomyId=144&intsrc=kc_li_story
- Added
{{dead link }}tag to http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/28767-1.html - Added
{{dead link }}tag to http://www.canadait.com/cfm/index.cfm?It=106&Id=19998&Se=2&Sv=Company&Lo=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Entrust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link }}tag to http://premium.hoovers.com/subscribe/co/factsheet.xhtml?ID=hjtccksschcfjr - Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Intellectual_Property_and_DRM&articleId=9001907&taxonomyId=144&intsrc=kc_li_story
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130805075102/http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearing/cybersecurity-threats-communications-networks-and-private-sector-responses to http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearing/cybersecurity-threats-communications-networks-and-private-sector-responses
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Reply
Since Entrust and Datacard Group have merged, there is a Draft:Entrust Datacard article in the works, that should describe the merged business. Should this be a separate article, or should one of the two articles be the active article to house Entrust Datacard? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Reply
- Resolved. Looks like the draft one redirect here now. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Reply
Entrustpr2020 and WordSmith007 apear to be the same entity connected to Entrust
[edit ]Entrustpr2020 was blocked some time ago after a few contributions to articles about Entrust, including Datacard Group and HyTrust. I'm afraid WordSmith007 is just a new account that belongs to the same entity due to similarity of edits done by two accounts. All edits are full of corporate talk like "diverse offerings", "recognizing company's focus", "digital transformation", etc. @WordSmith007: would you care to comment and clarify whether you have a connection to Entrustpr2020?
Article uses two different names, Entrust Inc. and Entrust Corp. Which one is correct? Anton.bersh (talk) 07:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Reply
- Website says 'Entrust Corporation' in various places, e.g. copyright banner at the bottom of https://www.entrust.com/rebrand-overview or in body text in https://www.entrust.com/legal-compliance/policies/ethics
- There are multiple sources with 'Inc.' in them. This is speculation on my part, but may be there was 'Entrust Inc.' which in 2013 was acquired by 'Datacard Group' which subsequently rebranded as 'Entrust Datacard' and then as 'Entrust Corporation'? That seems the sequence of events implied by the sources. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Reply
Both articles say that Datacard Group is the former name of Entrust so they are the same entity and it makes sense to have a single article about the two. Also, both articles are short on sorces; merging and trimming of trivia content would help with verifiability. Anton.bersh (talk) 08:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Reply
Tag on citation 58
[edit ]I don't see why a secondary source is needed for the leadership of the company. Surely the company is the best reference available for that information?
I've created a Sandbox draft that addresses all current page issues/callouts, including removing promotional-leaning language, adding missing citations, and adjusting language to ensure it matches the secondary source material. I've also removed non-evergreen information from the infobox, adjusted the lead to better balance the content of the page, and added an image of the current CEO (the current draft features an image of Entrust's former CEO).
Please review my Sandbox draft and provide any necessary feedback. If no objections, I'll make these changes in ~1 week. Thanks so much!
- The only feedback that is necessary is to stop using AI. Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
Concerns have been raised about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information.Rationale: This late 2025 rewrite, one of many by user, note WP:AISIGNS - promotional tone, vocab distro typical of 2025 LLM output, edit summary Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Computer security articles
- Unknown-importance Computer security articles
- Start-Class Computer security articles of Unknown-importance
- All Computer security articles
- Start-Class Cryptography articles
- Low-importance Cryptography articles
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- WikiProject Cryptography articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions