Talk:Engineering change order
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Grj23 in topic Proposed merge with Engineering change notice
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Electronics , an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page ElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The content of Engineering Change Notice was merged into Engineering change order on March 27, 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
There is nothing special about the chip industry in the way that a change is tracked. The information about the chip industry should move to a topic about the chip industry. More information about document control would be helpful since ECO are relevant to all manufacturing and relevant to all document control.
Should Engineering Change Order and Engineering Change Notice be merged?
It could use a section on Field Change Orders (FCOs) - an update made by field service personnel to systems already shipped from manufacturing. And a couple of redirects for the terms. AHMartin (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge ECN into ECO Grj23 (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC) Reply
Different names for same topic Rathfelder (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Reply
- Go for it.--Wtshymanski (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Reply
- I included the information from ECN into ECO. I think we could now redirect ECN to ECO and be done with the merge. Grj23 (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC) Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.