Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Electric clock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Time Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

[edit ]
Latest comment: 18 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

With some references and organization, could be a B.

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
Yamara 16:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Reply

The section "Electromagnetic Clock / Description" is talking about some specific design -- but it's not clear what. You refer to a circuit diagram ("In the presented diagram...") that isn't attached. 212.44.20.129 (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Reply

Master/slave clocks

[edit ]
Latest comment: 13 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Just a thought - should we make a mention of master/slave clocks or the Shortt-Synchronome clock? --Roly (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Reply

Electromechanical clocks

[edit ]

I would like to add info/mention about master/slave systems ````


Please do - it is an important omission. I have added a link to the Synchronome page. g4oep

Synchronous Electric Clocks

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

This article About power grid frequency from NBC seems to contradict what is in the section about accuracy. Anyone have more expertise than I on this? It's already marked as having no references. Preceding unsigned comment added by BrentRockwood (talkcontribs) 01:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Reply

I've added the word "Most" to the start of that paragraph. --Roly (talk) 07:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electric clock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /