Talk:Dutch Caribbean
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It might be a bit of a mouthful but renaming the article "Kingdom of the Netherlands in the Caribbean" might solve the conflicting part of the lead. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 17:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Reply
I propose that Dutch Caribbean be merged into Netherlands Antilles. I think that the content in the Dutch Caribbean article can easily be explained in the context of Netherlands Antilles, and the Netherlands Antilles article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Dutch Caribbean will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Laurel Lodged (talk) 22:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Reply
- There's another discussion about this topic at Talk:Netherlands Antilles#Merger proposal. PPP (talk) 07:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Reply
Perhaps this article might be improved in the history section, which begins about 1815. Is there additional Spanish history to any of these islands, individually or as a designated group, (without getting too deep into the 80 years war). Indigenous history too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Reply
Dutch West Indies redirecting here is slightly inaccurate as historically it included Suriname. While "Dutch Caribbean" is mostly used to reflect the present set-up of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, it was not a term much used either in the Netherlands or internationally during the period that Suriname was a constituent country of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (1954-1975), as far as I know. Appolodorus1 (talk) 13:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC) Reply
- I created a draft at Draft:Dutch West Indies. You can help improve it, so it can be moved to mainspace soon. — Ætoms [talk] 11:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Are there any sources on this? The Guianas were prominent mostly for their coastal settlements so they were included in coverage of the Caribbean. Even today Suriname is part of the Caribbean Community. Caribbean and West Indies are mostly interchangeable. CMD (talk) 20:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Reply
- This rewrite would be more factually accurate I feel:
- The Dutch Caribbean are the current constituent countries and special municipalities of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in the Caribbean Sea. They are located in the north and south-west of the Lesser Antilles archipelago. Together with Suriname, which gained independence from the Netherlands in 1975, these territories were historically also referred to as the Dutch West Indies. Appolodorus1 (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC) Reply
The use of the term "Dutch Caribbean" is misleading. While the article attempts to distinguish the different statuses of the territories, the overall structure — including the title, infobox, and Dutch flag — reinforces the impression of a unified political or geographic entity.
There is no legal or political entity by this name. The Statute of the Kingdom recognizes four countries: the Netherlands, Aruba (since 1986), Curaçao, and Sint Maarten (since 2010). The three autonomous Caribbean countries do not share a government, judiciary, or political framework, nor are they administratively or constitutionally linked to the BES islands (Caribbean Netherlands).
The term "Dutch Caribbean" is not used in the statute and is mainly promoted by Dutch institutions, not by the people of the autonomous countries themselves. Many Dutch organizations and businesses use it for their own convenience, even in addresses — e.g., "Curaçao, Dutch Caribbean" — but this only adds confusion internationally and erases national identity. You don’t say "Netherlands, Dutch Europe" as an address — yet this mislabeling continues.
This umbrella term is not neutral; it’s reductive and ignores decades of struggle for identity and visibility after the dismantling of the Netherlands Antilles. People identify with their countries — not with a vague label like "Dutch Caribbean," which doesn’t exist, can’t be found, and holds no legal standing, representation, or location.
It’s time to let go of outdated, colonial-style convenience labels and respect the names, status, and identity of the autonomous countries. — Neutralwikifixer (talk) 16:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- The lead clearly establishes what the article is about and that it is not about a "unified political or geographic entity", so arguing that it isn't a unified political or geographic entity misses the point. This post here appears to be a continuation of your recent nomination of this article for deletion, since it offers no suggestions on how to change the wording of the article to address the issues that you perceive but rather seems to contend that the term shouldn't exist. The term does exist, and is sufficiently sourced to indicate that it is notable enough for an article. If you have specific suggestions for wording to clarify what "Dutch Caribbean" means and is or to add information about it being a controversial term, and have reliable sources to support those suggestions, please make them. Schazjmd (talk) 17:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
i'm bothered by the fact that Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba are known collectively as the BES islands, while Curacao, Aruba and Sint Maarten are known collectively as the CAS islands. Sint Eustatius is apparently locally known as Statia, which makes abbreviating it with an 'E' even less logical. in comparison, the acronyms for the geographical collective of the Dutch Leeward islands —consisting of Saba, Sint Maarten, and Sint Eustatius— SSS. granted, the geographical acronyms are less commonly used than the political ones, but is there a logical reason for why we shouldn't use BSS instead of BES? —LGap (talk • edits) 15:58, 10 June 2026 (UTC) Reply