WikiProject icon This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
The deletion request in 2013 was the result of a plagiarizing page. The top plainly is notable enough now, years later, with 29 reliable sources covering the topic since 2014 and up until even now. I've drafted the article at Draft:Destiel as it fully meets notability guidelines, but I could not publish it due to the existence of this redirect. I formally propose deleting this redirect and moving the draft article into this namespace. Jessica3801 (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment ALT0 is probably the most interesting, but I'm about 60% sure the WP article needs to also refer to the spat as a shipping war for the hook to run. Also, shipping wars is a pretty niche term that might be worth a wikilink, so perhaps: ALT3: ... that Olive Garden and Chili's got in a ship war over Destiel? Based5290 :3 (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For some reason I thought this was a GA, and it isn't, though it is quite long. So I put together a list of nits that would be nice to fix. They are not necessary to fix for the DYK, but I thought as long as I put them together I may as well leave them somewhere. At least do fix the words-that-are-not-words, please?
"occasionally referred to as Deancas,[1] and as CasDean within the series itself" - the WP:LEAD is supposed to be a summary of the article, and these alternate names are not given elsewhere in the article body. Please give and cite.
(削除) "Supernatural debuted in 2005" - How about a brief intro - "The television series Supernatural debuted..." or even "The American television series Supernatural..." - otherwise the article doesn't explain what Supernatural is. (削除ここまで)
(削除) "From this episode, people began to want the two characters to become romantically involved with each other." "People" is vague, the citations say "fans"; maybe we can say that? Or "shippers"? Also the first of the three citations doesn't really mention "this episode" ("Lazarus Rising"). (削除ここまで)
(削除) " At the event, Collins answered the question "Is Castiel in love with Dean?"." - and ...? How did he answer it? Kind of important. (削除ここまで)
"This created controversy..." "This led to criticism" - the controversy led to criticism?
(削除) "...ChiCon, a fan was allegedly banned from the convention as a safety threat" - source says she was banned, and the convention confirmed, so it's not "allegedly". Did you mean "allegedly as a safety threat"? (削除ここまで)
(削除) "He later returned Twitter" - "to Twitter"? (削除ここまで)
(削除) "In 2014, Olive Garden posted about Dean and Sam's preferences." Specify that it's a restaurant, not a person, same with Chili's. Also what kind of "preferences" were meant? Sexual or food or something else? (削除ここまで)
(削除) "When asked about Castiel, Olive Garden replied that he would eat anything from Dean's plate, which was interpreted by fans to be in reference to Castiel." - Well, yeah, when asked about Castiel, they answered about Castiel, that's kind of expected, and does not need to be specified. Or did you mean "in reference to Destiel"? (削除ここまで)
(削除) "grudging [sic] respect" - doesn't need [sic], it's an established idiom (削除ここまで)
(削除) throughout: generally put the commas and periods outside the quotes, not inside, per MOS:LOGICAL (削除ここまで)
(削除) "encouraging queer readings of the serious" - what? (削除ここまで)
"character's death[9][22][23][24] which also stopped Death from killing Dean.[1][4][5][25][26][27]" - wow, that's a lot of references for one sentence. Do we really need more than, say, two or three at each of those points? Can we pick the best ones?
(削除) "His final words were wishing Dean goodbye, which The Mary Sue said was significant as they identified "Hello Dean" as Castiel's catchphrase." - don't you want "Goodbye Dean" here, to make the parallel clear? (削除ここまで)
(削除) There is inconsistency between the tenses used to describe this episode, "Despair". "Castiel admits" - present tense. "stopped Death", "left a handprint","final words were", "was then brought" - past tense. "Dean responds" - present tense. In general we use present, see MOS:TENSE and MOS:FICTENSE, and this article uses it in describing "Fan Fiction" (削除ここまで)
(削除) " written by gay man, Robert Berens, who " - Ew - "written by gay man"? How about "written by Robert Berens, a gay man, who..." (削除ここまで)
(削除) "Fan Fiction's" perceived dismissal - logical quotes would be "Fan Fiction"'s (削除ここまで)
" they claimed that the writers were encouraging queer readings of the series and the consistent denial that the story lines exists from creators of the series" - I don't understand that. Did you mean "encouraging queer readings of the series despite the consistent denial..."? And there is a pluralization conflict in "lines exists".
(削除) "killing queer characters once they are able to be happy.[3][4][5][9][23][24][26][17]" - again, what a lot of citations. Can we pick the best - oh - maybe - three? (削除ここまで)
(削除) " it was still a major success that the series had managed to bring the relationship into the series' canon in its long run and significant use of subtext" - they said use of subtext was a major success? (削除ここまで)
(削除) "the fans which were blaming The CW, the network on which Supernatural aired, was unhelpful" - the fans was unhelpful? the blaming was unhelpful? The CW was unhelpful? Needs rephrasing for clarity. (削除ここまで)
(削除) "reports Vladimir Putin was planning to resign" - please specify that he was the Russian president, and that he did not, in fact, resign. (削除ここまで)GRuban (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding of MOS:ALTNAME is that as long as there are less than three alternative names, there doesn't need to be further elaboration in the body of the article. I don't think there's a source elaborating on the etymology of any of the ship names, so there wouldn't really be a good place in the body for the alt names. Based5290 :3 (talk) 08:14, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the nominator, but I've done a round of copyedits which address some of the concern above as well as some other issues (mostly for concision, in a few cases removed information I thought was poorly supported by the citations or excessively detailed). Rusalkii (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
