Talk:David Fairchild

I don't know whether it is vandalism or ignorance that underlies the claim Fairchild introduced horseradish to the U.S., but it is simply not true. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable about the other plants mentioned in the lede, will take a look at whether Fairchild introduced any of the plants mentioned there.

Before Fairchild was even born, horseradish was grown commercially in the St. Louis area, principally in and around Collinsville, across the river from the city of St. Louis. Doubtless it also had been grown in the U.S. much earlier than that. See the Wikipedia article on horseradish, and/or one of its references: http://www.motherearthnews.com/Organic-Gardening/2003-10-01/Horseradish.aspx . Publius3 (talk) 01:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

The lede also said Fairchild introduced alfalfa into the U.S. This is not true. Alfalfa was grown in Oklahoma by 1850. See for instance http://alfalfa.okstate.edu/webnews/mar0697.htm . Publius3 (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

I see now that I may have overlooked the intended meaning of the lede, while reading it somewhat hastily. Perhaps the intended meaning is that Fairchild introduced some particular variety of horseradish, or of alfalfa, into the U.S. If so, perhaps someone who knows the subject matter will reword the lede to distinguish between plants he introduced, and _new_varieties_of_plants_ he introduced.

In support of any such assertions , references would be helpful. Publius3 (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

Publius3 - I see you have an interest in exactly what plants Fairchild introduced. That's great! The problem is that it is complicated. There may have been five varieties of wheat growing here. His guys brought back an additional fifteen varieties. Two of them caught on and now represent 40% of the current crop. I just made up these numbers, but you get the idea. I will make an effort to document this article better with verifiable references. GroveGuy (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

I agree Fairchild's plant introductions are not adequately described. To accommodate more detail, I added a section "Plant introductions". Being familiar with cotton, I added a description for that introduction. Roughly 160 words. For those of you familiar with his other introductions, please add your own descriptions.Condensinguponitself (talk) 19:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:David Fairchild/Comments Talk:David Fairchild/Comments , and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 14:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Fairchild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130809104231/http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/awards/public-welfare-medal.html to http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/awards/public-welfare-medal.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104014618/http://www.ntbg.org/gardens/kampong-history.php to http://ntbg.org/gardens/kampong-history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Reply